#23 - JRL 9297 - JRL Home
From: "Persephone Miel" <pmiel@internews.org>
Subject: Russian non-profits protest draft law.
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005
Dear David,
I'm not caught up on the list last several days (too much else going on) but
thought you might be interested in this translation of a letter of protest
against the terrible new draft law on non-profits in Russia.
The signatories listed here are the letter's initiators, a full list of
signers is on the website (in Russian only)
http://www.hro.org/ngo/about/2005/11/10-2.php
Thanks
Persephone
----------
http://www.hro.org/ngo/about/2005/11/10-2.php
Say ‘NO’ to tightening control over civil society
Statement by Russian non-commercial, non-governmental organisations
We, representatives of Russian non-commercial, non-governmental organisations,
hereby express our extreme concern about the bill ‘Amendments to Several Laws of
the Russian Federation’, which has been submitted to the State Duma, and which
is aimed at tightening control over civil society institutions. The proposed
legislative amendments completely contradict the previously stated support of
Russian political leaders for the development of civil society. If passed,
instead of the ‘stabilisation’ and ‘equality’ proclaimed by the sponsors of the
bill, these amendments will lead to the paralysis of public life,
destabilisation, and arbitrary application of the law.
Implementation of the bill ’Amendments to Several Laws of the Russian
Federation’, which was drawn up by a group of deputies from the parliamentary
factions ‘United Russia’, ‘Motherland’, the ‘Communist Party of the Russian
Federation’ and the ‘Liberal Democratic Party of Russia’, will curtail the
activities of numerous organisations and will be to the considerable detriment
of our country’s interests. We are convinced that society and the state have not
yet fully grasped the scale of work performed by Russian non-governmental
organisations. These organisations make a vital contribution to the economic and
social development of our country and assume those functions that are not
carried out by the state or by market institutions.
Experts unanimously agree that the bill discriminates against
non-governmental organisations; substantially and unjustifiably limits citizens’
constitutional right to assemble; has an injurious effect on the legal position
of public associations and non-commercial organisations; limits organisations’
freedom of activity; and reduces their status in comparison with commercial
organisations and federal and municipal non-commercial organisations.
The constitutional right of citizens to set up informal, unregistered, public
associations, which do not have the status of a legal entity, will be
restricted. Now citizens will be forced to notify the federal registration
service when they create a public association. The procedure for notification
will not be established by a law, but by the Russian government. In addition,
the bill contains an ill-defined list of conditions upon which registration may
be denied.
The bill provides for an unjustified tightening of control over the
activities of all Russian non-commercial organisations, irrespective of the
field in which they operate. Its intent is to give the federal registration
service additional powers to control organisations’ funds as well as the way in
which they allocate their resources. The registration service will be able to
request the accounts and administrative records of an organisation at any time
and without any grounds for doing so. The proposed legislative initiative will
not only deprive public associations of their self-regulating status, but will
also create conditions for arbitrary and selective application of the law by
government officials.
Particularly severe restrictions will be imposed on foreign non-commercial
organisations operating in Russia. The bill proposes banning foreign and
international non-commercial organisations from having representative offices
and branches on Russian territory. The only way in which foreign and
international non-commercial organisations will be able to run offices in Russia
will be to set them up as public associations and register them as Russian legal
entities. For legal reasons, this will be impossible for most foreign
organisations. As a result, many foreign non-commercial organisations, working
in diverse spheres, including culture, public health, education and
environmental protection, will find themselves operating in violation of the
law. Furthermore, foreign citizens who do not permanently reside in Russia will
lose the right to establish or participate in Russian non-commercial
organisations. This directly violates the Russian Constitution, which guarantees
everyone (and not just Russian citizens) the right to assemble.
A number of the proposed amendments directly contravene the norms of
international law as well as obligations assumed by our country, including
several articles of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights
and Fundamental Freedoms, which was ratified by Russia. The bill undermines
Russia’s reputation as a guarantor of international law. Passing the amendments
will severely damage Russia’s reputation, an act that will be felt all the more
keenly on the eve of Russia’s chairmanship of the G8 Summit of industrialised
nations as of 1 January 2006.
Experts believe that civil society will feel the grave consequences of this
bill within months of its passing. All Russian non-commercial organisations will
have one year in which to bring their organisational statutes into accordance
with the new requirements and to register with the Ministry of Justice
registration service. The penalty for non-compliance is liquidation. These
requirements will affect hundreds of thousands of organisations. Given the
bill’s unclear, unlawful and extensive grounds for refusing registration, it is
inevitable that non-commercial organisations will find themselves paralysed. All
kinds of non-commercial organisations will be affected, including those dealing
with charities, arts, disabilities, youth, human rights, and environmental
issues. Re-registering hundreds of thousands of non-commercial organisations at
the same time, while maintaining constant state control over their activities,
will be very costly and will come from the state budget. The sponsors of the
bill have intentionally kept quiet about the financial resources required to
support the provisions in this bill.
Despite statements made by the Russian government that there must be a
dialogue between the authorities and civil society, there was no consultation or
discussion of the bill with non-commercial organisations. The secretive manner
in which the bill was prepared indicates that its sponsors are fully aware that
it runs contrary to the interests of civil society, and that it would not be
considered acceptable were it to be the subject of a genuine, open, public
discussion.
We are convinced that what civil society needs is not ‘stabilisation’, but
intensive development. Total control will not promote development. Considering
the bill’s discriminatory nature, that it contradicts the Russian Constitution
as well as Russia’s international obligations, that it presents a very real
danger that it will be applied arbitrarily by government officials, that the
inevitable reduction in the activities of non-commercial organisations will have
negative economic and social consequences, that implementing the law will be
expensive, and that there are no reasonable arguments in its defence, we appeal
to the government and the parliament to reject this bill.
We declare: ‘NO’ to tightening of control over civil society, and ‘YES’ to
its unhindered development for the good of our country.
Initiators of the statement:
Lyudmila Alekseeva, Moscow Helsinki Group
Manana Aslamazyan, Autonomous Non-commercial Organisation ‘Internews’
Alexander Auzan, National Project Institute ‘Social Contract’
Lyudmila Vakhina, Human Rights Centre ‘Memorial’
Valentin Gefter, Human Rights Institute
Lidiya Grafova, Forum of Migrants’ Organisations
Leonid Grigoriev, Association of Independent Centres for Economic Analysis
Galina Grishina, Regional Public Organisation ‘East-West: Women’s Innovation
Projects’
Alexander Daniel, International Society ‘Memorial’
Yuri Dzhibladze, Centre for the Development of Democracy and Human Rights
Svet Zabelin, International Social-Ecological Union
Oleg Komarovsky, National Project Institute ‘Social Contract’
Ida Kuklina, Union of Committees of Soldiers’ Mothers of Russia
Tatyana Lokshina, Demos Centre
Arseny Roginsky, International Society ‘Memorial’
Yelena Rusakova, Youth Center for Human Rights and Legal Culture
Natalia Samover, Historian
Natalia Taubina, ‘Social Verdict’ Foundation
Mikhail Timenchik, ‘Tochka Opory’ (Support Point) Foundation
Yelena Topoleva, Agency for Social Information
Grigory Shvedov, International Society ‘Memorial’
Lev Levinson, Human Rights Institute
The statement is open for signing by all concerned citizens and organisations
that support it.
|