|
#17 - JRL 8415 - JRL Home
The Jamestown Foundation
www.jamestown.org
EURASIA DAILY MONITOR
Volume 1, Issue 107
October 18, 2004
More and more evidence implicates authorities in Beslan
disaster
BESLAN'S TRAGIC END: SPONTANEOUS OR PLANNED?
By Andrei Smirnov
More than one month has now passed since the tragedy in the North Ossetian
town of Beslan, but what really happened there is still subject to debate. When
the hostages crisis ended with hundreds dead, Russian authorities tried their
best to assure the outside world that the anti-terrorist assault had not been
planned from the very beginning. Officials said that the mysterious blast inside
the school, which killed many captives, and the terrorists shooting at the
escaping children and adults compelled special forces to join the local Ossetian
paramilitaries in a rescue attempt.
Some observers, however, have challenged the official version of the events.
Pavel Felgenhauer, the independent Moscow-based defense analyst, noticed that
helicopters appeared in the school area 17 minutes after the assault had begun,
while it usually takes at least half an hour for a helicopter to warm up its
engine.
There are many indications that preparations for the assault were well
underway on the morning of September 3. The fenced-off area near the school had
been expanded (Ezhenedelny zhurnal, #35, 2004), while local hospitals were
preparing for a large influx of patients (Liberation, September 4). In addition,
some of the rescued children told Izvestiya that the first blast was not inside
but "somewhere near the gymnasium's porch" (Izvestiya, September 4).
But this evidence is not as crucial as that obtained by Novaya gazeta from
sources with the Investigation Commission of the Russian Federal Assembly.
According to the newspaper, tanks and armored vehicles had been transported to
the school's vicinity on September 2 (Novaya gazeta, October 7; EDM, October
13). The newspaper further reported that several casings from rocket-propelled
flame-throwers (Shmel) were found on the roof of the building opposite the
school. Some witnesses said that the flame-throwers were used to set the roof of
the school on fire at the onset of the attack. In addition, a rocket-propelled
grenade destroyed one of the walls of the gymnasium, where the hostages had
gathered.
In fact, the information published by Novaya gazeta confirmed that at 1 pm on
September 3, Russian special forces launched a planned attack that ignored the
possibility that some of the hostages might die during the assault. In addition,
photos taken by journalists after the siege did not show any holes in the walls
inside the gymnasium (where they should have been if mines and bombs had
exploded inside), but a large hole was visible under the window near the
gymnasium's porch. The Novaya gazeta article forced the parliamentary Commission
to admit officially that "tanks, flame-throwers, and grenade launchers were used
during the assault" (yufo.ru, October 12).
It looks as though the anti-terrorist command post set up in Beslan was
ordered to end the crisis at all costs. We know the terrorists' demands, based
on the statement released by Chechen warlord Shamil Basaev. In his letter
addressed to Russian President Vladimir Putin, which the terrorists had given to
the Ingush leader and negotiator Ruslan Aushev, Basaev demanded the recognition
of the independence of Chechnya and withdrawal of Russian troops from the
republic. He offered in exchange to stop all anti-Russian activities in the
Caucasus and close all terrorist training camps. Basaev also promised that an
independent Chechnya would become a member of the CIS and join the Collective
Security Treaty. Putin immediately answered Basaev, saying in his September 2
speech that he would never endanger the fragile balance in the North Caucasus (Interfax,
September 3).
The assault came the next day, suggesting that the authorities were already
preparing for the operation.
The attack was to start at 1 pm, when officers from the Ministry of
Emergencies would enter the school to remove the bodies of dead hostages, as
agreed with the terrorists. The plan sought to attack the gymnasium, after first
taking out snipers on the roof with flame-throwers and making a hole under the
window to provide an escape route for the hostages. At the same time, another
assault group (a mixed squadron of officers from the "Alfa" and "Vympel" Russian
special units) would enter the school's main building to destroy the terrorists
and release other hostages.
But the masterminds of the anti-terrorist operation miscalculated the
terrorist's response. Basaev said that he had instructed his group to attack if
an assault began. "Alfa fighters know how to advance but do not know how to
defend themselves, you should damage the enemy as much as possible and show a
good example for those who will go after you," he declared (Daymohk, September
17).
Official reports said that the terrorists left the school immediately after
the explosions (Interfax, September 3). They rushed out of the building shooting
after special forces had killed two terrorists who were meeting with officers
from the Ministry of Emergencies (Daymohk, September 17).
According to voina.net.ru, a website run by veterans of the Russian special
forces, the commander of the main assault group, Colonel Oleg Ilyin ("Vympel"),
was killed by a terrorist during the first minutes of fighting. The commanders
of the other two groups (Major Alexander Petrov ("Alfa") and Lieutenant Colonel
Dmitry Ratzumovsky ("Vympel") also died almost immediately (voina.net.ru).
Chaos ensued. The special forces were left without commanders and had not
been briefed on what to do. The terrorists were attacking and hostages were
running everywhere. The special forces then began to retreat, many dying under
terrorist fire. Bullets coming from both sides hit hostages. When the operation
failed, the Russian command, unable to attack again, had no recourse but to use
all firepower, including tanks, to "finish off" the terrorists, while hostages
were still in the school and nearby buildings.
|