|
#18 - JRL 7187
Business Week
May 26, 2003
A Flat Tax Is Taking Root in, of All Places, Russia
From each according to...oh, never mind
By Jason Bush in Moscow
On May Day this year in Moscow, Communist diehards were on the streets by the
thousands waving red flags and blasting the government, as they do every May
Day, for selling out Russia to the capitalists. Yet there was one triumph of the
new moneyed class that the Karl Marx crowd kept quiet about. A day earlier, Apr.
30, was the deadline for millions of Russians to trudge to the mailbox or down
to the local inspectorate to pay their income tax. That tax is a flat 13% for
everyone, making Russia one of the few nations that doesn't impose a bigger duty
on its richer citizens. Why no protest? Because it's considered a great success
in a land where a few years ago it was hard to get anyone to pay taxes at all.
Introduced two years ago by President Vladimir V. Putin, the tax was designed
to bring order to the chaos of the chronically underfinanced state budget. One
senior government tax official estimates that before the flat tax took effect at
the beginning of 2001, Russians on average declared as little as 25% of their
income. Since it was introduced, there has been a marked increase in both
payment rates and revenue. Official statistics show that income tax revenue rose
28% between 2000 and 2001, and a further 21% by last year, after adjustment for
inflation. Total government revenue from personal income taxes shot up from an
unadjusted $6.2 billion in 2000 to almost $12 billion last year.
The Kremlin is pleased. "We don't think it's possible to force people to
pay taxes through repressive sanctions," says Mikhail Orlov, head of tax
policy at the Ministry of Economy. "The tax system may be primitive, but
it's simple." And, he added, so far it works.
Part of the credit for the turnaround goes to a clever advertising campaign
designed to convince taxpayers that the tax is a bargain. One TV ad during the
recent tax season showed two apples, one with a 13% slice cut out of it
representing the flat tax and the other missing a 30% chunk, a reference to
Russia's former top income tax. The message: Taxes are so low that any
reasonable person would pay up. "It's a small amount, so of course it's
worth paying," says Natasha Diniliouk, an accountant who lives in Moscow.
Only a minority of Russians question the fairness of taxing lower-, middle-,
and upper-income workers at the same low rate. A survey last year by Russia's
Public Opinion Foundation showed 43% of Russians polled supported the
flat-tax-based system, compared with 36% who want a more progressive tax code.
Some offer a cynical explanation. Nobody expects the wealthy and powerful to pay
their fair share anyway. "Why have a progressive tax system that doesn't
work?" asks Vladimir Redkin, an economist at Russia's Bureau of Economic
Analysis.
Moscow's flat tax was the brainchild of Putin's liberal economic advisers,
led by Putin chief economic adviser Andrei N. Illarionov. Proponents say that
with a single rate and few deductions, there's no need to spend hours with a
calculator to figure out how much is owed. "It's an amazing success,"
says Alvin Rabushka, senior fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institute, a
long-standing flat-tax advocate whose ideas helped shape Illarionov's thinking.
And the idea has spread to some of Russia's equally tax-starved neighbors.
Ukraine and Slovakia plan to adopt their own flat taxes. The Baltic republics
adopted theirs in the 1990s.
To be sure, the flat tax hasn't solved all of Russia's fiscal woes. Tax
evasion is still a big problem. What's more, the Russian tax system is still
rife with incongruities and disincentives. One problem is the huge burden that
employers bear from a payroll tax levied to pay for social security benefits and
state pensions. The tax is a thumping 35.6% on the first $3,175 of an employee's
income, which means companies have a big incentive to understate their
employees' true wages. The government promises to fix the problem, but has yet
to come up with a concrete plan.
And some wonder whether the flat tax is such a good idea. "Perhaps this
reform was too revolutionary," says Yevsei Gurvich, an economist at the
Economic Expert Group, a Russian think tank. He thinks a more progressive tax
system would bolster public confidence. Despite government assurances, many
Russians worry the flat-tax rate will go up.
Moreover, at some stage politicians and the voters who back them are bound to
begin demanding that the rich pay a higher rate of tax. But until then, the
country's flat-tax experiment is paying its way in solid, dependable revenues
for the government -- and satisfaction among the growing bourgeoisie.
|