|
#13 - JRL 7063
The Economist (UK)
February 15-21, 2003
Not beyond petroleum
Votes of confidence do not come much bigger. The $6.75 billion that British
Petroleum (BP) this week said it would pay for half of the Tyumen Oil Company (TNK),
Russia's fourth-largest oil producer, is a huge boost for Russia. It is the
biggest single foreign purchase of Russian equity ever, on its own worth more
than double last year's total foreign direct investment in the country.
In recent months, Russia has been moving on to the radar screens of a growing
number of deal-minded foreign corporate executives and investors--not just in
the oil industry--in most cases for the first time since foreigners were badly
burnt by Russia's devaluation and default in 1998. BP's deal is being seen, both
in Russia and abroad, as stamping a seal of approval on the country's progress
since the financial crisis of 1998 and, more broadly, since the asset-grabbing
chaos of the early post-Soviet years. Other multinationals are now expected to
take a closer look at Russia, and Russian firms will certainly increase their
efforts to tap multinationals for their expertise and money. It is not just the
fact of BP's investment that is significant; it is its manner. Rather than a
cautious 25% plus one share--the minimum blocking stake--BP went for an equal
partnership with the Russians, probably the maximum foreign ownership that is
politically acceptable in Russia. (Strictly, BP is not buying half of TNK, but
joining it as half-owners of a new firm that will include all of the existing
TNK plus BP's existing Russian assets.)
Nor can anyone accuse BP of naivety, given its past experience of Russia and
its new partner. In 1997 it bought a stake in Sidanco, a small oil firm, only to
end up in a bitter fight with TNK over some of Sidanco's assets--a fight that
highlighted the crookedness then commonplace in Russian business and the
loopholes in Russian law. BP lost the battle, and some of its money. For BP to
return to strike a deal with its former foe, surely things must have changed
fundamentally in Russia?
Up to a point. BP's experience means that it may be better placed than most
foreign firms to navigate the still risky Russian business world. Other oil
giants, such as ExxonMobil and Royal Dutch Shell, have a handful of joint
ventures and production-sharing projects in Russia, but none has yet braved
partial ownership, as BP began to do six years ago. Minority-shareholder abuse,
although less common than it was, remains a big factor scaring outsiders away
from Russian companies.
BP's investment may also say as much about the difficulties facing the oil
giant as about the joys of Russia. BP badly needs new reserves. Recently, its
share price has been battered by investors due to its failure to meet
oil-production forecasts, which it lowered three times in eight weeks last
autumn. Between September and January, BP's market value fell by around a
quarter, or $45 billion. This embarrassed its boss, Lord Browne, whose carefully
polished reputation as the golden boy of British business lost some of its
shine. Investors concluded that, although Lord Browne's strategy of cuddling up
to the green lobby with his talk of taking the firm "beyond petroleum"
was all well and good, they did not want it to be at the expense of producing
lots of oil (and profits) in the meantime.
BP has old, declining and relatively less profitable fields in places such as
Alaska and the North Sea which it has been trying to replace with new, more
profitable fields in emerging locations beyond the grasp of OPEC--notably
Azerbaijan, Angola, Trinidad, West Papua and in the Gulf of Mexico. In January,
it sold its Forties field in the North Sea plus other ageing assets in the Gulf
of Mexico for $1.3 billion. Now, with its stake in TNK, 30% of BP's reserves
will be in Russia--positioning it well, in the long run, to pump oil into China.
Any oil firms tempted to follow BP's lead may not have much to choose from,
however--even assuming that Russia's political establishment is willing to allow
more foreign ownership. Only one decent-sized Russian oil firm, Sibneft--TNK's
nearest rival--seems open to selling a stake to a foreigner anytime soon. Yukos,
which has become the biggest Russian oil producer, ahead of Lukoil, has talked
in the past of selling a small stake. But thanks to high oil prices it now has
spare cash and seems likelier to buy than be bought.
Beyond the oil industry, there are a few obvious targets for foreign
multinationals, if they can summon up the courage. There are some big formerly
state-owned car and telecoms firms, still struggling to modernise, plus
breweries and food factories. There has long been talk that a foreign firm will
buy into Norilsk Nickel, which extracts one-fifth of the world's nickel and
platinum from northern Siberia.
Yet although some Russian firms now see proper management control and
corporate governance as essential, they remain heavily concentrated in telecoms
and the oil industry. Even if foreigners snap these up, many Russian firms will
remain a mystery to potential buyers--at least until Russia has done more to
reduce bureaucracy and simplify tax and business law. Here, progress, though
genuine, is slow. In truth, it will only be clear that Russia has truly changed
when you do not have to be BP to invest there.
|