|
#14 - JRL 7006
Novoye Vremya
December 29, 2002
MIDDLE-AGE CRISIS
Putin has delayed his modernizing dream in 2002
Author: Sergey Shelin
[from WPS Monitoring Agency, www.wps.ru/e_index.html]
THE GAP BETWEEN THE OBVIOUS RENOVATION IN THE FOREIGN POLITICS AND THE
INTERIOR POLITICS HAS BECOME THE MAJOR COLLISION OF PUTIN'S FIRST PRESIDENCY.
APPARENTLY, PUTIN HOPES THAT IN DECEMBER 2003 OR SPRING 2004 IT WILL EVENTUALLY
BE THE TIME TO CARRY OUT REAL REFORMS. IT IS HARDLY LIKELY, BUT HE HAS BEEN
LUCKY SO FAR.
Recently, Genady Zyuganov said, "When there are so many reforms being
carried to simultaneously, it is difficult to avoid chaos." However, the
reforms are not being carried out - they are rather being announced, one by one,
in large quantities.
The list of promised reforms is so large that it will be enough until 2008,
while Vladimir Putin is the president.
In December, the government promised to make the tax reduction plan in
January, which will start working from 2004 or 2005. At the same time, the
government denied the reasonability of the tax reduction in fall.
The prime minister required that the defense minister should transfer the
army on a contract basis in 2007. However, it is not clear whether the army
recruitment system will be canceled - at the same time, the defense ministry
promised to think of the plan for reducing the army service to six months. It is
also promised that by 2007 juries will appear in all Russian courts.
The president has signed a decree on reforming the state service by 2005. the
ranking system for civil, military, and law enforcement officials will be put in
order, the money allowances will be increased, and, according to a Kremlin
official, they will turn into "valued members of the civilized society who
will render official services to citizens".
Another Kremlin official said meaningfully that the federal center has never
meant to forcedly merge the regions; however, he immediately added that this
question "may be included on the agenda" after a "clear base for
local self-administering" is formed.
The bills on transformation of the regional and municipal authorities will
form this base - they have been postponed by the Duma several times, now they
are scheduled for consideration in January. One of the bills stipulates dividing
the police into the federal police and municipal police. The security structure
is really "distributed" between Moscow and municipal authorities, the
regional governors will have not strength to oppose to the Kremlin's
innovations. Naturally, the gubernatorial corps opposes to this and the long
arguments have led to no consensus. Nonetheless, the beginning of the
regional-municipal reform is still scheduled for 2005. Other great reforms -
housing and utilities, energy, railroad - are slowly moving through the Duma in
the form of bills.
It seems the only area the innovations have not touched upon of late has been
politics. Nothing has been added to the earlier projects on ruled democracy and
two- or three-party system in the country.
Vladimir Putin has been repeatedly reproached for the absence of a distinct
program: evidently, the Russian president is already seeing in his mind the
Russia of 2008 - a modernized, almost modern country.
However, it will not catch up with Portugal; at the same time, the GDP will
grow by almost a third - according to governmental forecasts - and will
eventually leave the greatest achievements of the USSR behind!
NATO and Russia will become so friendly that they will almost merge. The
European Union will move to the right and new generation politicians will lead
it - they will resemble Putin's good friend Italian Prime Minister Berlusconi.
Bypassing cunning neighbors, the Russian gas will come to Europe by a direct
North-European gas pipeline - Europe will cancel all restrictions for importing
gas from Russia. The Russia-Europe borderline will become more and more
transparent and the no-visa regime will be discussed seriously.
Supertankers with Russian oil will leave or America from new oil terminals in
the north. The US will take no important decisions without consulting with
Russia as a strategic partner that will still be behind Great Britain but
overrun Turkey.
Russia's internal life will eventually be filled with lawfulness, order, and
reasonable freedom. The two- or three-party system will be working without
failures and probably will become popular.
Regional governors will become more modest, the regions will be extended, the
army will become professional, juries will sentence the bad and will justify the
good; Belarus and Chechnya will calm down and will take their places in Russia's
influence area....
Daydreamers often change the reality. However, very often the reality changes
daydreamers. Putin seems to be at this fork now: either his popularity rating
will be converted into real serious decision, or, more likely, it will start
falling.
People's love is the most surprising phenomenon that is accompanying Putin.
no expert could foresee it would be so stable. It is still said that Putin's
rating is the "rating of hope", but it is only partially true. Putin
is not only the incarnation of expectations, he is also trying to realize many
of his promises: he is putting officials on their places, carries out
large-scale popular and populist expensive measures, he is demonstratively tough
to all initial opponents - from Chechen separatists to politicized magnates and
anti-state intellectuals.
Besides, Putin is a good contrast to all Soviet and post-Soviet leaders of
the past four decades: unhealthy, with incoherent speech and even more
incoherent acts. The second Russian president is definitely healthy and
understandable.
Apparently, a great politician is the one who is able to use his popularity
for solving great problems. In 2002, Putin has solved only foreign political
problems: he managed to successfully dispel a whole set of old and new myths.
The myth of the terrible NATO expansion to the East was the easiest to
dispel. A noticeable, though not overwhelming, part of Russians has approved of
the idea of Russia's entrance to the North- Atlantic alliance.
Simultaneously, the union between Russia and Belarus has been excluded from
the list of "sacred cows". All competent people have always been aware
that the Russia-Belarus Union has been a rough setting to disguise the system of
transferring Russia's resources to the Minsk regime. Only in 2002, the Russian
president said it loudly; the head of the friendly state was indignant but
calmed down soon; the people have not reacted in either country.
Another myth was created by the present administration: a chimera that it is
possible to dictate to Europe the rules for the Kaliningrad transit. Naturally,
the real compromise that was reached in autumn looked like a defeat at the
background of that myth. Apparently, the "simplified transit document"
to travel from Kaliningrad and back is a visa; but it had been obvious from the
very beginning that it will be possible to travel through Lithuania only with a
visa. The objective was to soften the visa regime, which was reached. In all the
aforementioned questions, Putin took the risk and put his popularity rating on
the bet. He has lost nothing - it has been again proved that ordinary people are
little interested in the abstract foreign political issues.
Putin was convinced about the "pro-western" turn in Russia. First,
he acted as a pro-westerner. Second, he acted as a fighter against
fundamentalism, who understands and shares the logic of Bush's America. Third,
most important, he acted as a pragmatic modernizer. The global
military-political crisis of the early 21st century opened the "opportunity
window" for Russia which made it possible to get involved in the world
labor distribution - first, as a strategic partner of northern countries on the
fuel and energy market. Later, it will be possible to try its forces on other
markets.
In order to retain the "window" open, it is necessary to distinctly
pose oneself as a friend of the North, and it is obvious that Putin's policy in
2002 was aimed at resolving these issues.
Putin's successive foreign political and foreign economic choices after
September 11, 2001, have been aimed at creating proper conditions for
modernizing Russia in accordance with his viewpoints. Undoubtedly, Putin has
formulated his major targets quite distinctly. As for interior politics, the
experience of 2002 lead to conclusion: Putin is hesitating about the methods
which will lead to his aims. Another great issue is with whom he should reach
his aims.
Prime Minister Kasyanov said about Russians, "It is necessary to take
all measures to make winter a pleasant season for them and to make it possible
for them to enjoy the wonderful Russian winter." Metaphors often cover
dirty tricks. The communal services are warn out and it has not been repaired
for a long time. However, the absence of serious measures is a sort of a
political platform. Kasyanov spoke about "pleasant time" - Russia's
administrative class would like 2003 to be the pleasant and free of excessive
toil period for themselves.
Is it possible to combine Putin's modernizing schemes with the "pleasant
time" of bureaucrats who are yearning for stagnation? The compromise at
present is: first a little stagnation, than - many reforms. It is noticeable
that all decisive stages of reforms have been delayed until 2004-05, until after
the parliamentary and presidential elections.
From today's standpoint, this time seems to be the best for innovations.
However, it is doubtful what they will look like from a short distance. Besides,
both "tomorrow's" and the "day after tomorrow's" innovations
mean not to offend anyone -hence they are going to be rather expensive.
For instance, the military reform is not transferring the means from the
outdated item of expenditure but adding new ones to the old spending. The
intended municipal reform is not transferring the money from the regional level
to the municipal one, but searching for some additional income sources for both
regional and municipal levels.
Meanwhile, the resources for popular measures are about to exhaust. So far,
the growing state spending has been funded at the expense of the economic
growth. However, it has slowed down with every year and the government firmly
rejected the president's call to stir it up. Extensive layers of officials and
by-state entrepreneurs are not prepared to really reduce the state spending or
to separate bureaucracy from business.
Three years ago, the necessity of a rule democracy was explained by the
necessity to carry out unpopular but urgent reforms. Now, it turns out that slow
but sure this system is getting out of control having added nothing to democracy
in Russia. It is gravitating towards stagnation and is spending exports revenues
as fast and the 1990s political system ate the western loans.
The administrative elite has taken the additional oil export revenues not as
a modernization resource, but rather as a heavenly gift in order to survive
another year without teasing the people with sharp innovations.
The 2001 presidential address severely reproached the bureaucratic class and
hinted at the possibility of its quick renovation. In 2002, Putin has not
rejected this dream, but has postponed it.
In summer, the Constitutional Court prolonged the terms of the majority of
regional leaders for a long time. In the next five years, the president will
work with the same gubernatorial corps as today.
The rumor about a radical changes in the cabinet of ministers have also
failed many times. Putin obviously dislikes Yeltsin's passion for changes in the
government, and it is difficult to carry out a politically reasonable
replacement. The prior rarefied political element has been replaced with an
almost complete political vacuum. While a modernization carried out only
administratively cannot be fast, decisive, or irreversible.
The gap between the obvious renovation in the foreign politics and the
interior politics has become the major collision of Putin's first presidency.
However, the "window of opportunities" has not yet shut. Apparently,
Putin hopes that in December 2003 or spring 2004 it will wide open. It is hardly
likely, but he has been lucky so far.
(Translated by Arina Yevtikhova )
|