Since I started JRL in 1996 I've always had in the back of my mind an image of the ideal recipient of JRL. That is someone with the time, inclination, and curiosity to read everything with an open mind, particularly on controversial and complex issues, and striving for understanding even of things that one does not agree with. This notion comes perhaps from my Quaker background that is disinclined to divide the world into good guys and bad guys. I think this approach is also soundly based on a realistic understanding of human nature. Most people believe that what they think and say is what's right. And ignoring that fact often leads to inaccurate analysis and error.

In the current conflict in Georgia I am pulled in many directions. I will only offer one observation. The articulate partisans on this matter are capable of presenting a compelling and persuasive case. And the righteousness of that case is held with complete sincerity. I know that is hard for some to believe but it is absolutely true. And if one has made up one's mind about who is right everything can be interpreted to fit with one's preconception. The rush to judgement and to sustain the validity of one's judgement is overwhelming. That is sadly exactly where we are today. And for sometime to come. Being situated in Washington I have a certain angle on the problem but it exists everywhere. Certainly in Russia and Georgia.