#27 - JRL 2008-145 - JRL Home
RFE/RL
August 9, 2008
South Ossetia At Front Of New East-West Conflict?
By Brian Whitmore
Copyright (c) 2008. RFE/RL, Inc. Reprinted with the permission of Radio Free
Europe/Radio Liberty, 1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
www.rferl.org
In an effort to prod the West to Tbilisi's side in its rapidly escalating
armed conflict with Russia, President Mikheil Saakashvili is invoking the ghosts
of Cold War battles past -- Moscow's suppression of the 1956 Hungarian uprising,
the 1968 Warsaw Pact invasion of Czechoslovakia, and the Soviet incursion into
Afghanistan in 1979.
The Georgian leader's strategy is clear. Tbilisi's small army is no match for
the Russian military machine. Saakashvili's only chance of success in his bid to
regain control of the Moscow-backed breakaway region of South Ossetia,
therefore, is to globalize the conflict and turn it into a central front of a
new struggle between Moscow and the West.
"What Russia has been doing against Georgia for the last two days represents
an open aggression, unprecedented in modern times," Saakashvili said in a
televised address on August 8. "It is a direct challenge for the whole world. If
Russia is not stopped today by the whole world, tomorrow Russian tanks might
reach any European capital. I think everyone has understood this by now."
So far, the West has not taken the bait. The United States and the European
Union are sending envoys to Georgia to try to broker a cease-fire and Western
leaders have issued predictable statements calling on both sides to show
restraint.
Most European leaders, wary of antagonizing Moscow, have strived to come
across as more or less balanced in the conflict. And even Georgia's closest ally
in the West, the United States, has thus far offered little more than rhetorical
support.
Speaking in Beijing on August 9, U.S. President George Bush stepped up
Washington's criticism of Moscow calling for a halt to the shelling of Georgian
targets.
"Georgia is a sovereign nation and its territorial integrity must be
respected," Bush said. "We have urged an immediate halt to the violence and a
stand-down by all troops. We call for an end to the Russian bombings and a
return by the parties to the status quo of August 6."
Trying To Moving West
Since coming to power after the 2003 Rose Revolution, Saakashvili has
relentlessly sought to move Georgia into the Western orbit and out of Moscow's
sphere of influence. In order to do that, however, the Georgian leader needed to
resolve the standoffs over the pro-Moscow regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia,
which broke from Georgia with Russian assistance following wars in the early
1990s.
Prior to Saakashvili's rise, Russia was the only international player in
South Ossetia and Abkhazia, with troops in both regions under a CIS-sanctioned
"peacekeeping" mission.
"Saakashvili has been trying to internationalize the conflicts in Georgia
since he has come to office," says Sabine Freizer, the Europe program director
for the International Crisis Group, a Brussels-based think tank. "It has been
very much his strategy to make this an international conflict between the
traditional West and Russia, speaking in language of the Cold War and saying
that this is really the last frontier. He's been racking up those kind of
expressions in the past few days, but this is really nothing new."
The United States has been largely receptive to Saakashvili's efforts,
championing Tbilisi's attempt to join NATO, helping to train Georgia's armed
forces, and offering diplomatic support on the Abkhaz and South Ossetian
conflicts.
Europe, on the other hand, has been largely divided. Frontline EU members
like Germany and France, wary of antagonizing Moscow, have been reluctant to
offer Georgia anything more than lukewarm support. Newer member states like
Poland, the Czech Republic, and the Baltic states, with fresh memories of Soviet
domination, have been more forceful in support of Tbilisi.
Georgia moved into South Ossetia on August 7 in a large-scale operation to
regain control of the Moscow-backed separatist region, following days of clashes
in which both sides exchanged gun and mortar fire. Each side accuses the other
of initiating the hostilities. The offensive sparked a furious reaction from
Russia, which sent troops, military aircraft, and tanks to repel Georgian
forces. It was the Russian military's first offensive outside its borders since
the 1991 Soviet breakup.
It came as no surprise that the strongest European condemnation of Russia's
incursion into South Ossetia thus far came from Lithuanian Foreign Minister
Petras Vaitekunas, who said Moscow crossed "red lines" and committed "aggression
and an outrageous violation of international law." Poland, likewise, has called
for an emergency summit on South Ossetia.
Some analysts say that with the West divided, Saakashvili may have felt the
need to try to resolve the conflicts in Georgia's favor quickly, before the Bush
administration -- which has been a very strong supporter of Tbilisi -- leaves
office:
"Why precisely now? What made Saakashvili decide that this was the right
moment politically? In my opinion, one of the reasons is that Mikheil
Saakashvili believes the current U.S. administration has certain obligations
toward him and the next presidential administration -- particularly if this is a
democratic administration -- won't feel it has any these obligations and may
modify the overall stance on Georgia," Fyodor Lukyanov, editor in chief of the
Moscow-based journal "Russia in Global Affairs," told RFE/RL's Russian Service
in a recent interview.
If that is indeed the case, he appears to have badly miscalculated by failing
to anticipate Russia's robust response. And now that the long-simmering
confrontation has escalated from a diplomatic and political clash into armed
conflict, the West's options are increasingly limited.
"I really think he [Saakashvili] has taken it a step too far because if we
were really going to push back the Russians, you would need something like a
military intervention and that is not going to happen," Freizer says.
Analysts say the West does have some leverage over Russia. The EU, for
example, could suspend negotiations over a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement
with Moscow; the NATO-Russia Council could be dissolved; Russia could be
prevented from joining the World Trade Organization, or even kicked out of the
Group of Eight.
But its energy wealth, and the influence that buys, will likely prevent
anything more than a mild rebuke. Moreover, the United States and the European
Union badly need Russia's cooperation on issues like curbing Iran's nuclear
program.
But in the end, Moscow's efforts to be viewed as a responsible global player
will certainly suffer a serious blow due to the conflict.
"Russia's image is going to take a battering," Freizer says. "Russia has been
trying increase its international legitimacy as a defender of international law,
not only in the Caucasus, but also we've been seeing this in the Balkans as well
with the positions Russia has been taking on Kosovo. It is going to be more
difficult for them to stand in front of the Security Council as the big defender
of international law while they're bombing civilian targets and Georgian
cities."
RFE/RL's Georgian and Russian services contributed to this report.
|