#27a - JRL 2008-112 - JRL Home
Russia Profile
June 9, 2008
Blending With the Global Economy
The IMF and the World Bank Believe that Russia’s
Economy is Overheating
By Sergei Balashov
Inward and outward investment has been one of the key indicators of what many
see as an economic boom. Russia has seen a sharp hike in foreign direct
investment, which jumped from less than $7 billion in 2003 to over $27 billion
in 2007, or $396.3 per capita, which is more than twice that of Brazil and six
times greater than China’s for the same year.
“I’ve been involved in Russian investment since 2002, and I can say that the
situation has dramatically improved since then,” said Rainer Geiger, deputy
director for financial and enterprise affairs of the Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development. “At first, the performance was poor, but now Russia
has reached the top in both inward and outward investment, which opens new
opportunities for partnerships and cooperation. Outperforming China is quite an
achievement,” he added.
OECD is another major organization Russia is aspiring to join. Russia has had
a cooperation program with OECD since 1996, when it officially requested
membership. It has so far produced five surveys of the Russian economy
reflecting positive changes, including increased legislation efficiency, state
institutions’ accountability, and advancement of property rights. Still, there’s
more work to be done. “There is still room for improvement,” continued Geiger.
“If you look at the FDI as a percentage of the GDP, Russia has not been as
impressive as other countries, and there are a lot of business opportunities
which haven’t yet fully developed.”
As Russia is still a few years away from full membership in the OECD,
structural reforms are crucial for speeding up this process. “The improved
investment figures should not be taken as a reason to stop the reforms,” said
Geiger. “We’d like to see information transparency and good administration of
sovereign funds, as we’re looking forward to future cooperation. OECD needs
Russia as a major partner.”
“Both the WTO and OECD influence foreign investment,” said the deputy
director of the Department of Trade Negotiations of the Russian Ministry for
Economic Development and Trade Vladimir Tkachenko. “The WTO doesn’t regulate
capital movements, but the OECD goes further than that. The OECD has devised a
code of liberalization of capital movements, which entails certain obligations
in stability and transparency positively viewed by investors, Russian and
foreign alike. I think that just as in the case with the WTO, the advantages
we’ll gain from joining the OECD will include further improvement of the
investment climate, and the increase in investments into the Russian economy in
both scale and quality.”
Harnessing the growth
Sovereign funds have been the government’s main instrument aimed at curbing
inflation. The Stabilization Fund, which was set up in 2004 to balance the
federal budget and accumulate the profits from high oil prices, was split up
into the National Welfare Fund of about $32 billion and the Reserve Fund storing
over $130 billion. While it has been possible to keep inflation relatively low
over the past years, the government has had to deal with arguments that these
funds would be of more use if they were spent on various domestic projects, such
as improving the infrastructure and building more roads. Yet, as per the finance
ministry, such measures would only slow down growth, and have serious
macroeconomic consequences.
“We do have plenty of problems that remain unsolved,” said deputy finance
minister Alexei Pankin. “We have awful roads, our hospitals and transportation
need improvement. All of that is fair, and the poor quality of the
infrastructure slows down the economy, but the problem here is that any
additional inflow of money will not improve the situation. Any additional
spending by the government will cause inflation to grow. If we spend twice more
on roads, we will not get twice as many built. And this will also drive out the
private sector,” explained Pankin. “It would be possible to consider spending a
part of these funds on infrastructure projects, but only in a different
macroeconomic situation,” he added.
According to the latest reports of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and
the World Bank, Russia might have to do more than establish the funds to keep
inflation in check and balance the economy. While the IMF warned against
overheating of the economy, the World Bank issued a report stating that the
economy is already overheated, as the GDP growth rate has amounted to eight
percent, which is higher than its long term potential, with the producing
capacities outmatched by the growing aggregate demand spurring inflation and
creating a risk of further growth below the estimated potential. The report
states that following eight years of decline, consumer price inflation
accelerated to 11.9 percent in 2007, and is projected to reach anywhere from 12
to 14 percent in 2008, according to World Bank’s lead economist for Russia
Zeljko Bogetic.
The World Bank recommended balancing inflation and closing in on
institutional reforms and infrastructure gaps, to sustain long-term growth. In
conclusion of the report, World Bank analysts stated their belief that the
government was in the right position to tackle any possible setbacks. “President
Medvedev’s policy emphasis on the four I’s – institutions, infrastructure,
innovations and investment – outlines important priority areas for the new
government that could reinvigorate the structural reform agenda and further
productivity gains that form the basis for sustained economic growth in the
future,” states the report.
|