#15 - JRL 2007-213 - JRL Home
Jamestown Foundation
www.jamestown.org
Eurasia Daily Monitor
Volume 4, Number 188
October 11, 2007
INFIGHTING AMONG PUTIN'S SILOVIKI ESCALATES TO A "CLAN
WAR"
By Pavel K. Baev
Nothing has been left to chance in the latest, tightly controlled script for
reformatting the political arena in Russia. Generously granting his consent to
join the electoral list of the dominant United Russia party, President Vladimir
Putin appeared to have reduced the uncertainty surrounding the presidential
succession, as the parliamentary elections in December have now become a simple
vote of confidence with a pre-determined outcome.
The presidential elections scheduled for March have also lost intrigue, since
Putin's half-promise to accept the position of prime minister has reduced the
question about a "successor" to a mere technicality, with some experts arguing
that the shift of power to the government would be formalized by revising the
constitution. Others argue that Putin would return to his "natural habitat" in
the Kremlin after only a short spell in the temporary job (Nezavisimaya gazeta,
October 4; Moskovsky novosti, October 5). No opposition force could have
disturbed this orderly progress toward "more-of-the-same"; this week's
shock-wave has come from within the political class that serves as the main
pillar of Putin's regime - the leadership of the special services, collectively
known as the siloviki.
Tuesday, October 9, Viktor Cherkesov, the head of the Federal Service for
Control over Trafficking of Narcotics (Gosnarkokontrol), published a lengthy
article in Kommersant outlining the risks of an "internecine feud" among the
special services. The immediate cause for the highly unusual public declaration
was the arrest of General Alexander Bulbov, Cherkesov's deputy and right-hand
man, who was initially accused of many crimes, including exposing state secrets,
but now is charged only with illegal wire-tapping (see EDM, October 9).
Cherkesov and his colleagues vehemently insist that the case was fabricated to
derail the ongoing investigation into corruption and smuggling in the special
services, which Putin has personally assigned to Gosnarkokontrol supervision
(RIA-Novosti, October 10; Newsru.com, October 11). While Cherkesov is careful
not to reveal any names and puts the blame only on the newly created
Investigations Committee within the State Prosecution Service, it is no secret
that his attack is aimed at the all-powerful Federal Security Service (FSB).
The petty details of mutual accusations are perhaps less interesting than
Cherkesov's attempt to claim the high moral ground and advance an ideology of
chekizm (referring to the Extraordinary Commission -- ChK -- that unleashed the
campaign of state terror under the leadership of Felix Dzerzhinsky in the first
years after the October Revolution). Cherkesov claims that during the period of
moral decay in the 1990s, the chekisty closed their ranks and provided a
handhold that the desperate society grasped as their last hope and thus checked
its free-fall into the abyss. Now the infighting inside the chekist corporation
threatens to destroy that vital handhold, potentially resulting in a devastating
crisis and collapse of the still-fragile state. Typically, Cherkesov says
nothing about the law or political control over the feuding agencies but
proclaims the need to uphold corporate norms and solidarity (Ezhednevny zhurnal,
October 10).
The Bulbov case is indeed not an isolated squabble but a battle in the
escalating war between clans that use their enforcement capabilities to advance
business interests. Sergei Stepashin, a former prime minister with an impeccable
chekist pedigree, tried to make his Audit Chamber into a "power structure" that
would control financial flows between state agencies, but he suffered a painful
setback when several of his lieutenants were arrested on corruption charges
(Vremya novostei, October 9). Recently sacked prime minister Mikhail Fradkov,
whose performance was widely portrayed as pathetic, has suddenly re-emerged as
head of the Foreign Intelligence Service, while Sergei Lebedev, a professional
who directed this service for seven years, was inexplicably moved to the
hopeless job of executive secretary of the Commonwealth of Independent States
(Kommersant, October 8).
Putin is obviously trying to extinguish the flaring clan conflicts; the
Kremlin celebration for his 55th birthday invited all of the prominent siloviki
in an effort to boost corporate cohesion (Nezavisimaya gazeta, October 8). Putin
has also promoted a new clan, headed by newly appointed Prime Minister Viktor
Zubkov and his son-in-law Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov, who have never
belonged to the chekist brotherhood but have a solid base in the tax service and
financial monitoring sector (see EDM, September 19). Nothing, however, helps in
reconciling the warring parties that can no longer keep their infighting under
the proverbial carpet, so the peculiar details that the FSB generals sacked by
Putin have, in fact, retained their jobs and that Nikolai Patrushev, the head of
the FSB, has named Cherkesov as his "personal enemy" are leaked to the
newspapers (Kommersant, October 11; Ezhednevny zhurnal, October 4).
The problem is not that Cherkesov has become desperate about his limited
access to the "boss" or, perhaps, cherishes ambitions to become secretary of the
Security Council (a key post that has remained vacant for several months). The
real problem is that although Putin has many ties to the chekist corporation, he
cannot stop the increasing decay within. By reducing the political competition
to a meaningless show and empowering the special services, he has laid for
himself a perfect trap that was sprung exactly at the moment his plan for
walking over the "2008" watershed received a standing ovation from the
quasi-party of the ruling bureaucracy.
The chekists have apparently convinced him that there is no safe way for him
to step down from the summit of power, so the scheme with moving to the
prime-ministerial chair was put together in apparent haste (Gazeta.ru, October
8). It certainly lacks "elegance," as the trick of retaining power is too
transparent, but, more importantly it involves high risks of destroying Putin's
seemingly rock-solid credibility. Indeed, taking charge of the government, he
would have to accept responsibility for the galloping inflation, for the
increase in gas and electricity prices, and for every other problem that he has
pushed away towards a "successor." He would also be in no position to manage the
clan wars among the siloviki. In fact, keeping power is a very dubious
proposition, but every emergency exit has been very carefully closed.
|