#4 - JRL 2007-149 - JRL Home
RIA Novosti
July 6, 2007
Experts promise Russia an economic miracle
MOSCOW. (RIA Novosti economic commentator Oleg Mityayev) - The Russian
economy has been growing steadily in the 21st century. Yet experts have warned
of an impending crisis, or at least stagnation. Even the pro-Kremlin United
Russia party has made such forecasts.
However, the latest calculations by professional economists from government
and research agencies have refuted these gloomy forecasts.
According to the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade, Russia's GDP can
continue to grow at a high pace, by 6.5%-7% annually until 2020.
Economists from the Russian Academy of Sciences who were critical of the
government's economic policy have published an even more optimistic report about
Russia's future. They predict an annual growth of 8% until 2030.
The Institute of Economic Forecasting of the Russian Academy of Sciences has
provided solid facts to back their optimism, saying that Russia's GDP has been
growing faster than predicted in the last few years.
What are the reasons behind this growth? Why is the Russian economy
developing faster than predicted? The answer is simple: experts have been
relying on obsolete development models for their forecasts, whereas the world
has changed beyond their wildest dreams.
Viktor Ivanter, director of the Institute of Economic Forecasting, said there
are three main reasons for the rapid growth of Russia's GDP.
First, Russia has overcome the negative consequences of the severance of
economic relations with former Soviet republics in 1992 following the collapse
of the Soviet Union. It has turned from an administrative and territorial part
of the U.S.S.R. into an independent country with a comprehensive economy that is
integrated into the global economy.
Second, the transition period has ended, and Russia now has an efficient
market economy.
And third, the transition to market relations has triggered adjustment
mechanisms, which are helping the Russian economy overcome many problems and
obstacles.
It is thanks to these mechanisms that the myth of an imminent economic crisis
has been dispelled. A relevant example is the electoral platform of United
Russia, which in 2003 scared the people with warnings of a forthcoming
technological, food and financial collapse. It turned out to be wrong.
Andrei Illarionov, a prominent liberal economist and former economic adviser
to President Vladimir Putin, recently said that an economic miracle was
impossible in Russia. He said the country was incapable of catching up with the
industrialized countries, and its achievements were due solely to high oil
prices.
But the myth of oil prices as the only foundation for Russia's economic
growth is no longer valid. When oil prices seemingly reached their ceiling and
stagnation set in on the oil market, Russia's mechanical engineering and
manufacturing unexpectedly surged ahead, surprising the majority of experts.
There are quite a few problems that complicate Russia's economy, as well as
many obstacles hindering its advance to new summits. The economists at the
Academy of Sciences say the country still does not have an effective mechanism
for the movement of capital, which is vital for financing manufacturing.
Most rich Russians transfer their money abroad, later to be reinvested in
Russia when and if necessary. According to the Academy's experts, the government
should rectify this problem by investing surplus funds through the Russian
Development Bank and other specialized financial institutions.
Low wages and skills are another reason for the inefficient operation of the
manufacturing sector, and they also hinder innovation, a topic which has been
widely discussed recently by the government.
"The modern economy has put new demands on the workforce," Ivanter said.
"Innovation will remain nothing but fine talk unless the government begins to
pay high salaries to qualified workers."
Apart from the growth of investment, the economy also needs a growth of
consumption. Experts believe that wages in the knowledge-based economic sectors
should be at least doubled in the next two or three years.
"We must go over from the minimum wage to the standard wage, adjusted not to
the subsistence level, but to social standards," they say in their report.
One more major obstacle to Russia's economic growth is its technological lag
provoked by the stagnation of the scientific sector in the 1990s. This sector
can be revitalized with government support, thus propelling the national economy
towards an investment-fuelled annual average growth of 8%.
The authors of the report write that their conclusions differ from those of
the Economics Ministry's only "in their degree of optimism."
The ministry projected 7% annual growth and proposed three development
scenarios: one with sluggish growth and two positive scenarios, a
commodities-based and an innovation-fuelled. It is not clear which of the latter
two the ministry prefers, although the innovation-fuelled scenario appears to be
the better choice.
The experts showed in their report how investment can be channeled into
innovation.
The Academy of Sciences and the Economics Ministry do not want Russia to
develop according to the sluggish scenario. "Nobody wants to be poor any
longer," Ivanter said.
|