#23 - JRL 2006-76 - JRL Home
RFE/RL
March 28, 2006
Analysis: Are Ingushetia, North Ossetia On Verge Of New
Hostilities?
By Liz Fuller
Copyright (c) 2006. RFE/RL, Inc. Reprinted with the permission of Radio Free
Europe/Radio Liberty, 1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
www.rferl.org
It has been more than 13 years since Ingush and Ossetian informal militias,
the latter backed by Russian security forces, engaged in a brief but brutal
conflict in North Ossetia's Prigorodny Raion, to which both ethnic groups lay
claim. More than 500 people died in six days of fighting in early November 1992
that precipitated the flight from North Ossetia of tens of thousands of Ingush
settlers.
Due partly to a lack of political will and partly to inadequate funding,
measures adopted by successive Russian governments intended to enable the Ingush
fugitives to return to their abandoned homes in Prigorodny Raion have been
implemented only half-heartedly, with the result that the Ingush collective
sense of grievance has festered.
The Ossetians, for their part, remain resolutely opposed either to changes in
their republic's borders that would hand Prigorodny Raion back to Ingushetia, or
to the wholesale return of the Ingush to the district. The two sides have
recently launched new propaganda offensives intended to impel the Russian
leadership to amend the status quo in their favor.
Origins Of The Dispute
Prigorodny Raion was incorporated into North Ossetia when the Checheno-Ingush
Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (ASSR) of which it was originally part was
abolished in the wake of the 1944 deportation of the entire Chechen and Ingush
peoples to Central Asia.
When both ethnic groups were exonerated under then-CPSU General Secretary
Nikita Khrushchev and their republic was reconstituted in 1957, its borders were
amended to leave Prigorodny Raion within North Ossetia.
In April 1991 the USSR Supreme Soviet adopted a Law on the Rehabilitation of
the Repressed Peoples that stated that Prigorodny Raion should be handed back to
the then-Checheno-Ingush ASSR, but failed to specify how and over what time
period this should be done. The Checheno-Ingush ASSR split into separate Chechen
and Ingush republics in July 1992, but the borders of those two territories were
not formalized.
A detailed new program was unveiled in May 2005 for expediting the return of
the Ingush displaced persons to their abandoned homes in Ingushetia by the end
of 2006.
Because many of the Ingush who resettled spontaneously in Prigorodny Raion
following the passage of the 1991 law failed to register with the North Ossetian
authorities, estimates of the size of the Ingush population of Prigorodny Raion
on the eve of the November 1992 fighting and of the number of Ingush forced to
flee for their lives vary greatly. According to a Human Rights Watch report
compiled in 1996, there were 34,000 Ingush officially registered as residents in
North Ossetia in 1991; the Russian Federal Migration Service registered 46,000
forcibly displaced Ingush from North Ossetia; while the Ingushetian Territorial
Migration Service put the number at 64,000.
In the aftermath of the violence, Moscow imposed a state of emergency in
Prigorodny Raion that remained in force until 1995; a joint request two years
later by the then-presidents of both republics that it be reimposed was rejected
as unconstitutional by then-Russian President Boris Yeltsin. Yeltsin vowed
instead to increase funding to rebuild destroyed homes and create new jobs for
those Ingush who wished to return to Prigorodny Raion, but the Russian
government apparently failed to make good on that pledge, and in July 1999
Ingushetian President Ruslan Aushev threatened to suspend all talks with North
Ossetia until earlier agreements on measures to defuse tensions were
implemented.
Good-Neighborly Intentions
In October 2002, Aushev's successor, former Federal Security Service (FSB)
General Murat Zyazikov, and then-North Ossetian President Aleksandr Dzasokhov
signed a major "Agreement on the Development of Cooperation and Good-Neighborly
Relations" intended to "mark the beginning of a new stage" in bilateral
relations. That document obliged both sides to take the necessary measures to
eliminate the consequences of the 1992 clashes, including expediting the
repatriation of Ingush fugitives; preventing the creation of illegal armed or
separatist groups; and establishing mechanisms for consultations to prevent the
emergence and escalation of new tensions, according to ingushetiya.ru. Yet that
agreement too was ignored rather than systematically implemented, with the
result that as of September 2004 an estimated 40,000 Ingush displaced persons
from Prigorodny Raion were still living in tent camps in Ingushetia.
In May 2005, Dmitry Kozak, whom President Vladimir Putin named in September
2004 as his representative to the Southern Federal District, unveiled a detailed
new program for expediting the return of the Ingush displaced persons to their
abandoned homes in Ingushetia by the end of 2006. Kozak's staff initially
insisted on implementing that agreement to the letter, according to an article
published in "Moskovsky komsomolets" on February 13, but North Ossetian
bureaucrats have systematically created obstacles to the displaced persons'
return to their homes.
Consequently, as Ingushetian Minister for Nationality Affairs Magomed
Markhiyev told "Caucasus Times" on February 27, as of February only
approximately 12,500 displaced persons, or some 30 percent of the total number,
had returned to North Ossetia. Markhiyev said that Kozak's original plan is
being constantly modified by North Ossetian officials who are insisting that the
returning Ingush be housed in new settlements constructed specifically for that
purpose. For reasons that remain unclear, at a meeting in Rostov-na-Donu in
early February with government officials from Ingushetia and North Ossetia,
Kozak signed off on a new protocol to his original plan that provides for Ingush
returning to North Ossetia to take up residence in such settlements, rather than
in their abandoned homes.
The Ingushetian parliament promptly addressed an appeal to President Putin
rejecting that proposed arrangement as "pro-Ossetian," the daily "Kommersant"
reported on February 20. And in a statement adopted one month later, the
People's Assembly called for talks between its representatives, Zyazikov, and
Kozak's staff on "constructive and dynamic" measures to resolve the conflict in
accordance with the displaced persons' wishes, ingushetiya.ru reported on March
23.
Border Calls
Meanwhile, the North Ossetian parliament is preparing another appeal to the
Russian parliament to amend the 1991 Law on the Rehabilitation of Repressed
Peoples by removing from it the articles stating that the pre-deportation
borders between republics be restored. The Ingush responded to news of that
impending appeal by addressing four separate counterappeals to President Putin,
Prime Minister Mikhail Fradkov, the Russian Constitutional Court, and the
chairmen of the State Duma and Federation Council.
More ominously, a hitherto unknown group calling itself Patriots of Ossetia
posted a statement on March 16 on ossetia.ru arguing that measures reportedly
adopted by the Ingushetian leadership on March 9 to expedite the return of
Ingush displaced persons to North Ossetia herald "a new attack on us.... Clearly
if Ingush extremism is not reined in, we shall have to prepare for war! We must
not repeat past mistakes! This time no one will catch us unaware...! We are
ready to defend our Homeland with weapons in our hands!" that statement
concludes.
The March 23 statement by the Ingushetian National Assembly interpreted
Kozak's apparent capitulation to pressure from the North Ossetian leadership as
predicated on the assumption that, in time, the Ingush displaced persons will
abandon hope and accept whatever final solution to the standoff Moscow sees fit
to impose. But some of those hypothetical solutions might prove even less
palatable than the "ghetto" settlements in North Ossetia envisaged in the most
recent protocol to Kozak's original blueprint of May 2005.
Settlement Scenarios
One such solution would be to recombine Chechnya and Ingushetia into a single
republic with two titular nationalities, by analogy with the Kabardino-Balkaria
and Karachayevo-Cherkessia republics. True, Zyazikov has rejected that proposal
on more than one occasion. But his Chechen counterpart Alu Alkhanov has been
less categorical, suggesting that residents of both republics should vote on the
issue in a referendum.
A second possibility, floated in an article published in "Rossia v global'noi
politike" and reposted on ingushetiya.ru on March 10, would be to merge
Ingushetia and North Ossetia into a single republic and thus abolish once for
all any grounds for disputing the borders between them, ingushetiya.ru reported
on March 10. That approach would have the additional advantage, as journalist
Makhmud Malsagov pointed out in a commentary posted on ingushetiya.ru on March
13, of assimilating the "unruly" Ingush with the "loyal" Ossetians.
It is not clear, however, how such a merger would impinge on a putative
alternative geopolitical project, namely the unification of North Ossetia with
Georgia's breakaway Republic of South Ossetia. Unlike his predecessor Dzasokhov,
who advocated resolving the conflict between the central Georgian authorities
and South Ossetia by transforming Georgia into a federation in order to grant
more substantial rights to both South Ossetia and Abkhazia, Taymuraz Mamsurov,
who was named North Ossetian president in June 2005, has repeatedly advocated
the unification of the two Ossetian republics.
Whether Kokoity's stated intention on March 22 to petition the Russian
Constitutional Court to designate his republic part of the Russian Federation --
a proposal for which Mamsurov and some Russian officials have reportedly
expressed support -- reflects top-level Kremlin support for unification is
unclear. Those statements may have merely been intended as a way to hit back at
the Georgian authorities for their consistent blocking of Russia's accession to
the World Trade Organization.
|