#28 - JRL 2006-119 - JRL Home
Subject: RE: 2006-#118-Johnson's Russia List/ Hough
[re: demographics, birth rates, life expectancy]
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006
From: "Thomas Nichols, CIV, NAVWARCOL" <thomas.nichols@nwc.navy.mil>
Regarding Jerry Hough's rather peculiar outburst over the problem of birth
rates and life expectancy in Russia, in which he excoriates Americans "of both
parties" for refusing to "raise the issue" and wonders why human interest
organizations won't "speak up" :
The Russian health care system is a mess. This is not news. But for Hough to
compare the problem of life expectancy (which is in many cases driven by choice,
however ill-informed those choices may be) with the forcible extermination of
millions of innocent people in the mad schemes of totalitarian dictators is
simply obscene. it is the kind of facile comparison that rightly makes people
possessed of any amount of common sense wary of the opinion of intellectuals,
and only clouds an issue on which reasonable people might find themselves
otherwise in substantial agreement.
What, exactly, would Hough have the United States--or for that matter, human
rights groups--actually *do* about Russian life expectancy? Send troops to
Russia to slap cigarettes and vodka bottles out of the hands of young men? Pass
resolutions in the Security Council that Russians must buckle their seat belts
and stop driving like maniacs? Embargo the Russian government until it makes its
population sit up straight and eat its vegetables?
The life expectancy of Russian men (some of whom I count among my friends) is
a genuine tragedy. But to invoke Hitler, Stalin, and Hannah Arendt in
hyperventilation about how long Russians live--to say nothing of the
wince-inducing comment that Sudan "at least has an excuse" for its appalling
genocide--contributes nothing to the discussion. If I were a Russian (of any
age), I would be deeply offended by Hough's breezy comparisons, to say nothing
of his paternalism. As an American, I am embarrassed.
And if this is the "most incredible thing" Hough has seen in 50 years, one
can say only that he's missed quite a lot.
|