|
 |
 |
 |
 |
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
| Topics: Security/International :: Domestic :: JRL :: Firefox-optimal :: site feedback | |||||||||||||||||
 | |||||||||||||||||
|
#38 - JRL 2006-101 - JRL Home From: "Najat Idrissi" <n.idrissi@rodopi.nl> Subject: New book: Montaging Pushkin: Pushkin and Visions of Modernity in Russian Twentieth-Century Poetry by Alexandra Smith Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 Montaging Pushkin: Pushkin and Visions of Modernity in Russian
TwentiethCentury Poetry. Montaging Pushkin offers for the first time a coherent view of Pushkin’s legacy to Russian twentieth-century poetry, giving many new insights. Pushkin is shown to be a Russian forerunner of Baudelaire. Furthermore it is argued that the rise of the Russian and European novel largely changed the ways Russian poets have looked at themselves and at poetic language; that novelisation of poetry is detectable in the major works of poetry that engaged in a creative dialogue with Pushkin, and that polyphonic lyric has been achieved. Alexandra Smith locates significant examples of Pushkin’s cinematographic cognition of reality, suggesting that such dynamic descriptions of Petersburg helped create a highly original animated image of the city as comic apocalypse, which followers of Pushkin appropriated very successfully even as far as the late twentieth century. Montaging Pushkin will be of interest to all students of Russian poetry, as well as specialists in literary theory, European studies and the history of ideas. “Smith's thesis is both startling and original: that Pushkin, for all his Mozart-like fluidity and perfection, can be productively read as a poet of pain and violence. His reflex was to respond to the totalizing, authoritative public landscape of his era with an equally severe but specifically private, individualizing, disciplined set of demands on the Poet. The recurring attention that later generations have paid toward those aspects of Pushkin's life and texts governed by the private right to resist or to initiate violence (his duel, his struggles with the bureaucracy, his failed pursuit of service with honour) suggest that this mythologeme is among the most productive in Pushkin's astonishing legacy” CARYL EMERSON (A. Watson Armour III University Professor of Slavic Languages and Literatures, Chair of the Slavic Department, Professor of Comparative Literature at Princeton University) “Smith's innovative study offers a wonderful analysis of how cinematographic editing and polyphony are detected in Russian twentieth-century poetry... It views Pushkin as a “référence obligée” of contemporary urban poetry” VÉRONIQUE LOSSKY (Professor Emeritus of Russian Literature at the Université de Paris-Sorbonne IV) * SSLP is a series of monographs and occasional collections of papers in the field of descriptive and theoretical Slavic poetics. SSLP appears at irregular intervals. For subscription and review copy please refer to our website http://www.rodopi.nl/oi.asp#review N. Idrissi North America
|
|