|
#20 - RW 3-11-05 - RW Home
RFE/RL
March 10, 2005
Analysis: Georgia Parliament Ups Ante On Russian Bases
By Liz Fuller
Copyright (c) 2005. RFE/RL, Inc. Reprinted with the permission of Radio Free
Europe/Radio Liberty, 1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
www.rferl.org
Deputies in Georgia's parilament voted unanimously on 10 March to call on the
government to effectively blockade the bases if the two countries do not agree
on their removal by mid-May.
Under an agreement signed at the OSCE Istanbul Summit in November 1999,
Russia undertook to close by 1 July 2000 its military bases in Vaziani, near
Tbilisi, and Gudauta, Abkhazia, and to begin talks with the Georgian leadership
in 2000 on the timeframe for closing its two remaining bases in Batumi and
Akhalkalaki. Russia complied with first of those commitments, and embarked as
required on talks on shutting down the latter two bases.
But in the course of those talks, Russian officials have consistently argued
that a lengthy time period is required to build housing in Russia for the troops
to be withdrawn from Georgia. (That argument is specious insofar as many of the
personnel at the base in Akhalkalaki are in fact ethnic Armenians who are
citizens of Georgia.) Initially, Russian officials said they needed 15 years to
close the bases, then 14; that figure was revised downward to 11, and then eight
years, according to Georgian Prime Minister Zurab Noghaideli on 9 March.
After the Georgian and Russian sides failed during Russian Foreign Minister
Sergei Lavrov's visit to Tbilisi last month to make any progress toward solving
either the deadlock over the bases or any of the problems bedeviling bilateral
relations, it was agreed to establish working groups to seek to narrow the
disagreements and report on 1 May to the countries' two presidents. Those
working groups will focus on six issues, including the proposed framework treaty
on friendship and cooperation and the timeframe for the closure of the two
bases.
Despite that agreement, Givi Targamadze, chairman of the Georgian
parliament's Defense and Security Committee, announced within days of Lavrov's
departure that the two remaining Russian bases should close by 1 January 2006 at
the latest. On 25 February, parliament speaker Nino Burdjanadze suggested that
the Georgian leadership might declare the Russian bases illegal if an agreement
is not reached soon on a date for their closure. Then on 7 March, parliament
deputy Giga Bokeria unveiled a draft bill that would require Russia to agree
formally by 15 May to close the two remaining bases by 1 January 2006. If Russia
rejects or refuses to met that deadline, the Georgian parliament would declare
the bases illegal and measures would be taken to prevent them from functioning:
Georgia would, for example, decline to issue visas to Russian military
personnel.
Bokeria's draft bill appeared to take the Georgian leadership by surprise.
ITAR-TASS on 8 March quoted parliament speaker Burdjanadze as telling the
independent television station Rustavi-2 that parliament should not adopt such a
bill until after the expiry of the two months agreed by Moscow and Tbilisi to
try and reach a compromise. President Mikheil Saakashvili also implicitly
cautioned the parliament against adopting the bill. He reaffirmed on 8 March
Georgia's "crystal-clear" position that the bases should be closed, but proposed
waiting to see whether it is possible to reach an agreement with Russia within
the two month period, as did Prime Minister Noghaideli. Parliament was scheduled
to debate the draft bill on 9 March, but postponed the debate until 10 March at
Burdjanadze's request.
On 8 March, a senior Russian military official condemned the planned debate
as an attempt at blackmail, and on 9 March the Russian Foreign Ministry warned
that the debate would make it more difficult for the two sides to reach the
hoped-for compromise agreement. "The Russian side will shortly submit its
proposals aimed at finding solutions to existing problems," the Foreign Ministry
statement continued.
In what have may have been a deliberate leak intended to defuse mounting
tensions, on 10 March, izvestiya.ru quoted an unnamed Russian Defense Ministry
official as saying that Russia does not want to keep the bases in Georgia
forever, but their personnel will be redeployed to the Caucasus to serve in a
new mountain rifle division which will be formed only three or four years from
now. While that time frame might appeal to the Georgian leadership -- in that
the bases would theoretically have been closed prior to the expiry of
Saakashvili's first presidential term -- it may not be enough to mollify the
parliament. And that anonymous statement represents a clear retreat from earlier
Russian arguments in favor of simply renaming one or both bases an
"anti-terrorism center."
Meanwhile, the Georgian State Employment Agency is already addressing the
problem of providing employment for the Armenians who currently account for up
to one third of the personnel at the Akhalkalaki base, and who are already
expressing unease at the prospects of losing their livelihood in a region with
few employment opportunities. The Georgian daily "Rezonansi" on 10 March quoted
the agency's chairman, Levan Peradze, as saying that a job-creation program is
in the works, and he suggested some of the personnel in question may find jobs
in private security services. And Goga Khachidze, who was recently named
governor of the Djavakheti region where the Akhalkalaki base is located, pledged
the same day that the Georgian leadership will do everything possible to ensure
that its closure "is painless" for the local Armenian population.
As the Georgian authorities have failed consistently to deliver on earlier
promises to improve conditions in the remote, mountainous and impoverished
region, the Armenians are understandably skeptical. David Rstakian, leader of
the Virk party that represents the local Armenian community, was quoted by
Caucasus Press on 10 March as saying, "The Armenians of Javakheti will do all
they can to prevent the Russian troops from leaving Akhalkalaki. If Russia
refuses to pull out its troops, it may need our help."
That help, he implied, would be willingly offered.
|