|
#15 - RW 12-24-05 - RW Home
Ukraine: East And West -- Different Histories, One
Future
By Valentinas Mite
Copyright (c) 2004. RFE/RL, Inc. Reprinted with the permission of Radio Free
Europe/Radio Liberty, 1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
www.rferl.org
Ukraine's geography and history have played an important role in the
country's current political crisis. Western parts of the country at times
belonged to Poland, Austro-Hungary, and Czechoslovakia, while eastern and
southern parts bowed to Moscow. Only after World War II did Ukraine attain its
present borders as a republic within the Soviet Union. That history partly
explains Ukraine's voting patterns, political sympathies, and outlook on the
future. Still, analysts say that despite disputes over the recent presidential
elections, Ukrainians have little choice but to get along together in one
country.
Prague, 21 December 2004 (RFE/RL) -- Ukraine's political turmoil has led to
calls by some leaders in the pro-Russian east to seek wider autonomy from Kyiv.
Recently, those calls have been toned down as the country gears up for repeat
presidential elections on 26 December.
Nonetheless, analysts say the historical and cultural differences among the
Ukrainian regions are likely to be reflected yet again in the new runoff between
pro-Russian Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych and his Western-leaning rival,
Viktor Yushchenko.
Generally, people in the west speak Ukrainian and are more nationalistic.
Those in the industrial east speak Russian, and their strong pro-Russian
sentiments are largely absent in western Ukraine.
The west largely supports Yushchenko. The east and south mainly back
Yanukovych.
Volodymyr, a coal miner in the eastern city of Donetsk, echoed a common
perception there, telling RFE/RL his region would prosper if it didn't have to
economically support the rest of the country.
"I support [autonomy plans because] we will live better than together with
them, with western Ukraine," Volodymyr said.
Many dispute that claim, saying Donetsk actually receives more aid from Kyiv
than it contributes in tax revenues.
But Nikolay Petrov, an analyst of Russian politics at the Carnegie Moscow
Center, said that skewed perceptions are only part of the problem.
He said that history itself has created differences among the regions of
Ukraine. The east for centuries was part of the Russian Empire while the western
regions belonged to other European states.
"Western Ukraine is made of these territories, which were part of Poland,
part of Austro-Hungary," Petrov said. "This is the reason for differences in
language. In one case, [the language] is more 'Russified,' in the other case it
has words that come from the Polish language. [History also brings] some
differences in mentality and in political culture."
Oleksandr Lytvynenko, an analyst with the independent Kyiv-based think tank
Rozumkov Center, said Ukraine attained its present borders only half a century
ago -- too short a time to erase history's inheritance.
"In fact, Ukraine in its present borders exists from 1945, when
Trans-Carpathian [territory] was annexed to it," Lytvynenko said. "And though
during these 50 or 60 years some differences were removed, some still remain."
Lytvynenko said the Soviets encouraged different regions to be suspicious of
one another. Soviet authorities distrusted Western Ukrainians because many
fought against the Soviet Army during World War II and in the armed resistance
afterward.
A similar attitude toward Westerners can still be found among people in the
east.
Yet in a 1991 referendum, a majority of voters, even in eastern Ukraine,
supported the country's independence.
And while eastern leaders earlier this month threatened to hold a vote on
widening their regions' autonomy should Yushchenko take power, Yanukovych
himself pledged yesterday to protect Ukraine's unity, regardless of the outcome
of the upcoming repeat runoff.
For his part, Lytvynenko said he does not believe Ukraine's territorial
integrity is threatened.
"There is no evidence indicating the opposition between the east and the
west," Lytvynenko said. "Not only the western regions but also the central and
northern regions -- from Kirovohgrad to Sumy - voted for Viktor Yushchenko, for
the values he declares in his program and his speeches."
Lytvynenko said that no one in Ukraine, east or west, wants union with
present-day Russia. But he said that people in the eastern industrial centers
are nostalgic for the Soviet Union.
"The Soviet mentality is conserved here," Lytvynenko said. "It is a paradox
but all pro-Russian feelings that exist here are based not on sympathies toward
Russia, which is also 'capitalist and bourgeois' [as Ukraine], but on nostalgia
for the Soviet Union."
Lytvynenko said that workers in this former Soviet hub of industry suffer
from such nostalgia because they were once privileged. They were paid higher
salaries and were proud to be upheld as model proletarians by Soviet
ideologists.
Lytvynenko added that the interests of people in "pro-Russian" southern and
eastern regions are actually quite distinct. He said that economic elites in all
areas compete among themselves, while Donetsk miners have little in common with
Russians from the southern Crimean Peninsula.
Petrov of the Carnegie Moscow Center agreed, he said that separatism is
unlikely to become a serious political force in the near future.
"This separatism is observed in isolated regions, but I cannot imagine that
macro-regional structures will emerge," Petrov said. "I can see little in common
between, let's say, Crimea on one side, Donbass, on the other and Odessa on the
third. There is little in common between them to allow them act united."
Although the east strongly backs Yanukovych, his rival is also courting
voters there.
In a recent live interview on Ukrainian radio, Yushchenko held out the
possibility that Russian could become an official language. He also stressed
that Ukraine "is destined to pursue a policy of strategic partnership with
Russia."
|