|
#12 - RW 7-23-04 - RW Home
Jamestown Foundation
EURASIA DAILY MONITOR
Volume 1, Issue 57
www.jamestown.org
22 July 2004
Tashkent looks to Moscow to replace lost U.S. aid
WASHINGTON PUSHES KARIMOV CLOSER TO MOSCOW
By Yuriy Yegorov
On July 15 Elizabeth Jones, the U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for
European and Eurasian affairs, officially concluded her two-day visit to
Uzbekistan, where she had met with the country's leadership and local
representatives of several human rights organizations. On July 13, on the eve of
her visit to Tashkent, the U.S. administration announced its decision to cut $18
million in financial assistance to Uzbekistan. According to the official
statement issued by the U.S. Department of State, this measure was adopted in
reaction to "the insufficient progress in implementing democratic reforms" in
Uzbekistan. The statement specifically mentioned the deaths of suspects held in
prisons and the unwillingness of the authorities to register opposition parties.
There is increasing speculation that Great Britain and other European Union
members may follow suit (Nezavisimaya gazeta, July 15, 2004)
Many observers in Uzbekistan and Russia believe that Assistant Secretary
Jones had intended to hold private discussions about human rights issues with
the Uzbekistani leadership, to whom Washington repeatedly expressed sincere
gratitude for assistance in the conduct of the anti-terrorist operation in
Afghanistan. Uzbekistan was the first of the post-Soviet Central Asian states to
offer the United States permission to open an air force base on its territory,
specifically in Khanabad, which is located close to the border with Afghanistan.
This air base became the largest U.S. military bridgehead in the region, and it
marked the beginning of a serious shift in the balance of strategic forces
between the United States and Russia. In the course of her visit, Jones was
supposed to convince Tashkent that the aforementioned decision to cut financial
assistance did not imply a change in the American interests in the region or the
unwillingness to continue cooperation with Uzbekistan.
According to sources close to government circles in Uzbekistan, Tashkent did
not take the news of the $18 million cut well, as the government had relied on
the funds. The U.S. Department of State's decision is viewed as a public rebuke
of the Karimov regime, and Uzbekistan's leaders realize that this move signals a
new and very unfavorable turnaround by Washington. However, President Islam
Karimov will not respond by revoking the agreement on the American air base in
Khanabad, because its operation brings a relatively small but stable income to
the Uzbekistani authorities. Besides, the continuous operation of the air base
is considered an asset for the stability of the regime. It must be also noted
that Washington continues to offer substantial military-technical assistance to
Uzbekistan. In May 2004 the United States gave Tashkent equipment and special
hardware for border defense, which was worth total of $516,600. Since April 2000
the total of American military-technical assistance to Uzbekistan amounts to
approximately $7 million.
Some political elites in Tashkent believe that Karimov had anticipated the
shift in U.S. attitudes long before it occurred. For example, when he visited
the United States in 2002, Karimov was furious that his arrival at Andrews Air
Force Base was greeted only by Assistant Secretary Jones. For the president of a
country with 25 million people, this was a demeaning diplomatic gesture. Karimov
had flown to Washington with hopes of securing U.S. political support and to
resolve many internal problems with the American financial assistance.
Nonetheless, by late 2002 U.S. financial aid to Uzbekistan amounted to only $160
million and another $55 million in loans to purchase goods in the United States
for developing small and medium business in Uzbekistan. As one well-connected
source commented, "This meant that Tashkent was put in the common waiting line
in front of the main entrance to the White House."
In September 2003 Karimov told Russian President Vladimir Putin, who had made
a brief stopover in Samarkand on his way to India, that he had finally overcome
the initial "euphoria" of hopes related to developing economic relations with
the West. This meeting prompted the later reassessment of relations between
Uzbekistan and Russia, which eventually culminated in the two presidents signing
the Uzbekistan-Russia Treaty on Strategic Cooperation in June 2004. Moreover,
Uzbekistan and Russia also reviewed their bilateral military cooperation and
resolved to strengthen this relationship. Tashkent firmly believes that, unlike
Washington, Moscow will never make its assistance contingent on demands for
democratic changes.
At the same time Uzbekistan does not want to jeopardize its relations with
the United States and wants to preserve the bilateral partnership. This is why
on the eve of the Jones visit to Tashkent, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
issued a communique that stressed that the American-Uzbek relations are
characterized as "strategic partnership" and that they are "effectively
evolving."
The United States continues to be one of Uzbekistan's ten largest trade
partners. In 2003 the trade volume between the two countries amounted to $335.2
million, including $106.7 million in weapons. The results of the first quarter
of 2004 show that the trade volume between the two countries amounted to $153.1
million (an increase of 124% compared to the same period in 2003), of which
exports comprised $28.5 million (up 31%), while imports amounted to $124.6
million (167.3% higher). The negative balance of bilateral trade amounted to
$96.1 million. There are currently 24 priority investment projects in Uzbekistan
involving American companies and financial institutions. The total monetary
value of these investment projects amounts to $2.383 billion, including American
loans and credits totaling $1.406 billion. There are 316 enterprises created
with U.S. investors, including 227 are joint ventures and 89 wholly established
with of American capital. The enterprises range from mining to chemicals,
consumer goods, foodstuffs, and machine manufacturing.
|