|
#10 - RW 260
excerpt
U.S. State Department
Foreign Media Reaction
June 4, 2003
G-8 SUMMIT: EVIAN A 'NICE ATTEMPT' BUT NO 'MIRACLE CURE'
RUSSIA: "There's Been No Rapprochement"
Vadim Dolganov filed from Paris for official parliamentary Parlamentskaya
Gazeta (6/4): "Things are much more difficult than they might seem. It does
not look like the White House realizes how serious the consequences of bypassing
international law are and how long it will take to overcome the 'Iraq syndrome.'
It is fair to say that there really has been no rapprochement between Bush on
the one side and Chirac and Schroeder on the other, since the basic differences
have remained. And so has Russia's principled stand on the war in Iraq. The use
of force is no way to spread democracy."
"Chirac: This Is A Multipolar World"
Natalia Gevorkian commented in reformist business-oriented Kommersant (6/3):
"This meeting, peculiar for its membership, must attest to Chirac hoping to
use the summit to solve his own problems within and without. The rightist
president of leftist France must be suggesting a formula of 'liberal
globalization' as a way to reach a consensus in the postwar world and possibly
in his own country. It is hard to tell what the French will say to that, but it
is doubtful that the Americans will accept a new world notion from someone who
has not paid a price for the last war. This is also a signal for the French that
their president has remained a peace-lover, a big wheel in international
politics--for all his differences with Bush--and an unselfish capitalist
concerned for the good of the entire mankind."
"Differences Remain"
Svetlana Babayeva remarked on page one of reformist Izvestiya (6/3):
"Declarations only confirm that, friends or no friends, divergences within
the Big Eight remain, including when it comes to what should be considered the
world's chief problems: poverty in Africa, ups and downs in their own economies
or dictatorial regimes."
"Few Believe Global Government"
Nationalist opposition Sovetskaya Rossiya editorialized (6/3):
"Generally, the Big Eight is trying to show that its concerns spread to the
development of the rest of the world, as well as to their own problems. But few
believe that the global government cares about the problems of poor and
oppressed countries and peoples."
"Official Agenda Is Just A Screen"
Gennadiy Sysoyev held in reformist business-oriented Kommersant (6/2):
"The agenda of the Evian summit includes a lot of topics, some of them
unrelated, from war on terrorism to stable development to combating SARS. But
then, of course, the official agenda is more like a screen behind which the
world leaders who have gathered in that French resort-town will play games, each
his own. This is the true intrigue of the summit.... Jacques Chirac avoided
meeting with George Bush in St. Petersburg, denying Vladimir Putin the
opportunity to become a peacemaker for the two most vociferous antagonists in
the Iraq crisis. By shaking hands with the U.S. President in Evian, Chirac
scored a 'historical point' for the summit.... Though France
insists that G-8 is no directorate to run the world, people still tend to see
it as a sort of global Politburo. The impression will grow even stronger in
Evian. The United States has again grabbed the role of one who while being an
equal among equals, is a bit more equal than the others. Some kind of General
Secretary.... The UN role has slowly but steadily been waning, its functions
turned over to other structures and fora."
"Bush-Chirac Meeting Is Chief Intrigue"
Svetlana Babayeva said in reformist Izvestiya (6/2): "Practically all
call the Bush-Chirac meeting the chief intrigue of the summit.... Bush will
leave for the Middle East, with the summit halfway through its agenda. The hosts
are very disappointed, realizing that the Americans still bear a grudge against
them over Iraq."
"There's No Alternative To Partnership"
Yevgeniy Grigoryev stated in centrist Nezavisimaya Gazeta (6/2): "The
main thing about the U.S.-Russia meeting is that it has confirmed that there is
no alternative to a strategic partnership between the two countries....
Importantly, Russia and the United States, as Bush said, will continue to
enhance cooperation in the ABM area. Also, the U.S. President supported the
Kremlin's policy for a settlement in Chechnya, sounding a lot more definitive
than the EU leaders. That and other accords, including in the economic field,
and particularly the invitation for Putin to visit Camp David next fall, are
evidence that the 'Iraqi pain' in relations between Moscow and Washington has
abated, and the two powers are getting back to active strategic
interaction."
CDI Russia Weekly #260 ~ Contents Next
|