
#13
Russia: Moscow Hails Oil Merger But Pursues Probe
By Michael Lelyveld
The Russian government has been sending mixed signals on its support for
private enterprise in the oil industry. While hailing this week's $35 billion
merger of oil giants Yukos and Sibneft, the government is threatening the
licenses of Yukos operations in eastern Siberia, apparently for the benefit of
state-owned companies.
Boston, 24 April 2003 (RFE/RL) -- Despite government praise for the merger of
two Russian oil giants, one appears to be the target of a government probe aimed
at blocking its expansion in Siberia.
This week, top officials hailed the announcement that Russia's second-ranked
Yukos and fifth-place Sibneft would combine to form the world's fourth-biggest
oil company. It is also arguably the most closely held.
Hundreds of millions of dollars worth of shares are concentrated in the hands
of Yukos Chief Executive Mikhail Khodorkovsky and Sibneft's main owner, Roman
Abramovich, both men under 40. Their company fortunes are believed to have
multiplied more than tenfold since they were scooped up in the infamous 1995
loans-for-shares scheme.
Since then, Yukos has worked to improve its transparency and burnish an image
of good corporate governance. More questions may surround Sibneft, which helped
engineer a widely-condemned auction of state shares in the Slavneft oil company
only four months ago.
But the birth of an all-Russian oil mammoth may mark a milestone of sorts.
The merged company will produce 2.3 million barrels of oil per day, nearly 30
percent of Russia's output, according to the London-based "Financial
Times."
Russian government officials were quick to point out the benefits for the
entire country. Prime Minister Mikhail Kasyanov said of the $35-billion merger
of Yukos and Sibneft, "Consolidation of such companies will surely result
in higher competitiveness of Russia on the world's oil market. It is an
important and positive event," RIA Novosti reported. Kasyanov said that
"Russia will only gain from it."
Finance Minister Aleksei Kudrin also cited the merger as "an example of
how privatized sectors can attain positive results."
But in recent months, Yukos has been the focus of an intense licensing review
by the Natural Resources Ministry, according to the Moscow-based industry weekly
"The Russian Energy."
Unlike the ministry's sweeping series of oil- and gas-licensing inspections
last year, the newsletter said that in February and March "the inspections
seemed to be fine-tuned, targeting mainly strategic interests [of] one company,
Yukos, which is considering eastern Siberia its principal ground for
expansion."
On 10 April, Deputy Minister Aleksandr Povolotsky announced that a ministry
task force would recommend that 24 of Yukos' development licenses be revoked,
RBC News reported.
The inspectors said they would ask the Tax Ministry to calculate how much
economic damage had been caused. Povolotsky charged Yukos subsidiaries with a
slew of violations, including "massive environmental damage" from open
burning of gas and failure to meet production obligations.
Much of the criticism was aimed at Yukos subsidiary operations in the Tomsk
and Yakutia regions, which are oil sources for a planned pipeline to China.
"The Russian Energy" weekly pointed to rival plans of state-owned
Rosneft and Gazprom for the east Siberian region as a possible cause of the
Yukos probe. Both companies have opposed the China pipeline, preferring a much
longer and more costly project to the Far East port of Nakhodka that would
primarily serve Japan.
The newsletter said, "It seems that the government is looking for a
pretext to prevent Yukos expansion in that area, using all means to achieve this
goal, from administrative pressure to providing red-carpet treatment to state
companies that are eyeing potentially attractive assets in Eastern
Siberia."
Other industry publications, including "Petroleum Argus," have been
charting a struggle for control of east Siberian assets and development for
months. Rosneft and Gazprom wrote to President Vladimir Putin last month
proposing joint development of resources in the region which are not under their
control. Gazprom has proposed that it be given charge of all the region's gas
projects, reducing the role of private companies to "drafting feasibility
studies," "Petroleum Argus" reported in March.
It is unclear whether the course of the conflicts will change, now that
Kasyanov has designated YukosSibneft as the "flagship" of the Russian
oil industry.
Last week, Energy Minister Igor Yusufov said the government had decided to
allow private ownership of export pipelines for the first time as long as it
could maintain other forms of state control. That decision would seem to favor
the Yukos pipeline to China, while this week's praise for the merger suggests
official support for a new and privately-owned national champion in the
industry.
But the targeting of Yukos subsidiaries and the power struggle in Siberia
point toward the opposite trend, making it uncertain whether Kasyanov was
voicing the enthusiasm of the moment or a government policy.
BACK TO THE TOP #254 CONTENTS NEXT ARTICLE
|