CDI Headlines Hot Spots Research Topics CDI Publications Television Search
CDI Mission CDI Staff CDI Expertise Paid CDI Internships Support CDI
CDI Home
CDI Russia Weekly Home

RW 2003 Master Index   Iraq: RW 2003             


 
Johnson's Russia List
 
 
CDI Russia Weekly Home Page
 
 
CDI Russia Weekly 2003
 
 
CDI Russia Weekly Archives
 
 
Search the CDI Russia Weekly
 
 
Links
 
 
 

CDI Russia Weekly #252 Contents   Printer-Friendly Version

#16
gazeta.ru
April 10, 2003
Russian military reform no more than an illusion
By Tatyana Morozova

A round-table conference dedicated to military reform in Russia was held in Moscow on Wednesday. Political scientists, military experts and human rights activists, who took part in the debate, concluded that the discussion of the issue over the past 10 years has not helped to work out a viable plan.

Resulting from the 6-hour discussion, participants of the conference, including State Duma deputies, the Union of Soldiers' Mothers, human rights activists, political scientists and military experts arrived at two key conclusions: there can be no Russian state without a strong army, but at present, there is no basis for creating such an army in Russia. Therefore, military reform in Russia is unviable.

Military reform may prove a success provided there is economic growth; but if the country's economy is in crisis, reform may entail further disintegration of the country -- that thesis was reiterated in the speeches of almost all the participants.

For instance, Makhmut Gareyev, the president of the Academy of Military Sciences, claimed that protecting an enormous country like Russia at such low a level of economic development is impossible.

Therefore, in the near future Russia may become but a geographical definition of the territory between east and west. Grigory Tishchenko of the Russian Institute for Strategic Research shares this opinion. ''To conduct major changes in the armed forces, one needs, first and foremost, money, and so far, the reform has amounted to merely decreasing the strength of the armed forces.''

In future armed conflicts Russia cannot afford to lose as many human lives as were lost in the 20th century's w ic crisis. That's why special emphasis has to be laid on the creation of a nuclear shield and the development of high-tech equipment, believe the experts.

Today, there is the impression that Russia has no enemies, and nobody threatens it, but one must not forget, that there are no friends in politics, just interests. ''As history shows, almost all wars were waged solely for control over natural resources,'' says Anatoly Dolgolaptev, the president of the League of Assistance to Defence Enterprises. ''That is why the fight for the riches of our subsoil is quite likely. We must be strong, to repulse the attacks.''

The military is convinced that the United States still remains the main threat to the national interests of Russia. However, Russia is unable to compete with America. The domestic military-industrial complex is on the decline and is not able to produce new weapons, while the weapons the Russian army uses are obsolete and are continually being stolen.

President of the Foundation for Support of Military Reform Pavel Zolotaryov recounted that Russia spends 15-20 times less on training its soldiers than the international norms. Only 20 per cent of the national armed forces are equipped with modern weapons. At the same time, even those ''lucky'' units experience severe shortages of spare parts.

''It is a miracle that we still have the military-industrial complex at all,'' holds Zolotaryvov. ''In the past 10 years the complex received orders for only 4 planes and 6 helicopters.''

Anatoly Sitnov, the head of the Centre of International Cooperation, agreed with Zolotaryov, pointing out that since 1991 the state stopped financing scientific research, and the disintegration of the defence industry began. As a result, Russia has fallen some 15-20 years behind western states in terms of high-tech developments.

Thus, the military experts agreed that in the current situation Russia has no army to protect itself and to ensure national security.

The vice-president of the board of military experts Alexander Vladimirov said that presently for Russia there is no sense in trying to catch up with the US in terms of defence industry development, since Russia's revenues account for a mere 1 per cent of world trade.

He also recalled the moral decay of the Russia army, and theft and corruption flourishing among the top brass. ''For many years a system of negative selection, and staff close to the authorities involved in stealing has formed in the army. Criminals cooperate with criminals, because it makes it easier to agree,'' Vladimirov said. Only the public will, the moral effort on the part of each citizen is able to overcome that system both in the army and in the government. Therefore, the expert concluded, Russia lacks an important condition vital for conducting successful military reform â€" a civilized society.

State Duma deputy Alexei Mitrofanov told the round table that in his opinion the plans to transfer the armed forces from conscription to a contract principle of recruitment were alien, since it is not in the Russian people's tradition to serve and protect one's homeland for money. Mitrofanov said that what Russia needs is not a small professional army but a large army that would be able to handle the natural calamities and harvesting. To explain his idea, Mitrofanov recalled the disaster at the Chernobyl nuclear pant. Soldiers were dispatched to Chernobyl to clean up the consequences of the disaster. ''Would contract soldiers go there? No. And those soldiers went because they were under oath.''

Most of the participants of Wednesday's discussion agreed with Mitrofanov's opinion that creating a contract-based army is impossible in Russia. With oil prices soaring and the Central Bank's reserves amounting to $55 billion, Russia still cannot afford a professional army. ''This is so, because the army is not on the government's priority list,'' the deputy concluded.

The experts also noted that army reform has been discussed since 1993, but no clear and viable plan has been worked out in that time. Ida Kuklina of the Soldiers' Mothers' Union expressed the opinion -- backed by other participants of the discussion -- that what is currently going on in Russia is not reform but an imitation of it. Certainly, successful and effective military reform in Russia has so far proved impossible.

 

BACK TO THE TOP    #252 CONTENTS    NEXT ARTICLE


 
CENTER FOR DEFENSE INFORMATION
1779 Massachusetts Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20036-2109
Ph: (202) 332-0600 · Fax: (202) 462-4559
info@cdi.org