
#4
Moscow Times
February 13, 2003
Most Righteous War of All
By Pavel Felgenhauer
The Soviet Politburo hoped that some day the Franco-German axis, initiated by
French President Charles de Gaulle some 40 years ago, would break up NATO and
deliver Western Europe into Soviet hands.
In the 1960s, the West did not disintegrate. Gaullist France itself became
isolated -- neither Germany nor anyone else in Western Europe was ready to
seriously undermine solidarity with the United States in the face of tens of
thousands of Soviet tanks in Central Europe.
Today, with the old Soviet Union in ruins, France and Germany (supported by
Belgium) are ready to undermine Western military cohesion to save the
totalitarian dictatorship of Saddam Hussein and his Baath party from being
overthrown.
Of course, today Russia is too weak to seriously exploit the new rift in the
West. But many in Moscow are happy to see it happen: The dream of a "multipolar"
world seems to be materializing. France, Germany, China, Russia, the Vatican --
i.e. all, or almost all, world centers of power with the exception of Washington
are joining forces to prevent the U.S. war machine from rolling Hussein out of
office.
It would seem strange that so diverse a collection of forces would unite to
defend a bloody Nazi-style dictatorship in Iraq. But actually this de facto
alliance has existed for decades.
In the 1930s, West European pacifists were the prime political force that
supported appeasement of Adolf Hitler. In the 1940s, the Vatican wholeheartedly
cooperated with the Nazis and after the demise of Hitler helped war criminals to
escape justice. In turn, the Nazis used environmentalist and antiglobalist
slogans to fight what they believed was the Jewish-dominated "world
plutocracy."
I lived for almost 40 years under a totalitarian regime, and I know from
first-hand experience what life without freedom means. Anti-war protesters in
Western Europe and America do not know and could not care less.
Only by military means can millions of Iraqis be released from total
servitude, and Hussein destroyed along with his Baath party that has ruled Iraq
since 1958. If there ever existed such a thing as a "just war" then
the coming U.S.-led invasion of Iraq could be the most righteous of them all.
In 1991, after a military victory and the liberation of Kuwait, allied forces
stopped short of Baghdad. A ceasefire was signed that left Hussein in power.
It's easy to envisage a similar scenario in 1944: After the liberation of
France and Belgium, the war could have stopped at the borders of Hitler's Reich.
A ceasefire could have been signed (the Germans were at the time actively trying
to start negotiations to organize such a ceasefire). A UN inspection team could
have been deployed to destroy Hitler's ballistic missiles and other weapons of
mass destruction. Hitler and his party would have continued to rule in Berlin
and would surely have played games with UN arms inspectors, using underground
factories and so on.
Western pacifists, the Vatican and all those that today adamantly oppose the
liberation of Iraq by force would surely have liked an outcome that would have
left Hitler in power and saved many German lives and German cities. The Germans
were in fact liberated against their own will -- the majority continued to
support Hitler to the bloody end.
In April 1975, Hussein visited Moscow to ask for Soviet help to build a full
reactor to make nuclear weapons. Although Russia agreed to supply Iraq with
staggering amounts of conventional weapons, it balked at helping Baghdad go
nuclear. In September 1975, Hussein went to Paris to meet politicians with far
fewer scruples than Soviet Communists. The French prime minister at the time,
Jacques Chirac, signed an agreement to sell Hussein a reactor and arms-grade
uranium.
If Chirac and other French politicians had had their way, Hussein could have
made tens of nuclear bombs by 1990. The war to liberate Kuwait would never have
taken place or would have turned into an all-out nuclear confrontation between
Iraq, Israel and the United States. The tragedy was avoided when in 1979 Israeli
agents near Toulon destroyed two French-built reactors en route to Iraq. In
1981, the Israelis bombed to debris the French replacement reactor in Iraq
before it could be made operational.
Maybe France and Germany are so loyally trying to save Hussein because they
want to cover up their long-time cooperation in helping to build weapons of mass
destruction? Is the treachery of the past feeding more treachery today?
Pavel Felgenhauer is an independent defense analyst.
BACK TO THE TOP #244 CONTENTS NEXT ARTICLE
|