
#13
Roll Call
February 13, 2003 Thursday
U.S. Must Act To Secure Russia's Tactical Weapons
By Karl F. Inderfurth
Karl F. Inderfurth is senior adviser to the Nuclear Threat Reduction Campaign.
He served as assistant secretary of State in the Clinton administration.
With each passing day, the United States apparently moves closer to a war to
rid Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction. While our nation is rightfully
focused on the seemingly inevitable military action in Iraq and the elevated
threat of terrorist attacks, there is one question that has received
insufficient national attention: How do we keep nuclear weapons out of the hands
of terrorists in the first place?
Although for the most part its work has gone unnoticed by the news media, the
Senate Foreign Relations Committee has been toiling for many months to address
this question.
In May 2002, President Bush and Russian President Vladimir Putin signed the
Treaty of Moscow. It requires both sides to cut by two-thirds their number of
operationally deployed long-range nuclear weapons, over a 10-year period. That
agreement is an important step in the right direction, but much more is required
to make certain that Russia's weapons of mass destruction are not acquired by
those who would threaten the United States or its friends and allies with
catastrophic terrorism. During the committee's hearings on the Treaty of Moscow,
Sen. Dick Lugar (R-Ind.) rightly said: "We have a window of opportunity to
reduce the threat of former Soviet weapons of mass destruction."
To its credit, the Foreign Relations panel seized that opportunity. Under the
leadership of Sens. Lugar and Joseph Biden (D-Del.), the committee unanimously
approved a strong resolution of ratification that includes a number of
conditions and declarations to increase overall U.S. national security.
One of the most important of these conditions requires the president to
submit to the Senate an annual report on the amount of Nunn-Lugar Cooperative
Threat Reduction financial assistance Russia will need to meet its obligations
under the treaty. As Lugar noted, "Without U.S. assistance Russia cannot
meet the timetable of its obligations under this treaty. Without Nunn-Lugar it
is likely the benefits of this treaty will be postponed or never realized."
The U.S. government must also ensure that delays in implementing Nunn-Lugar
programs, as occurred last year, never happen again.
Also, the committee has required the White House to annually provide the
Senate the necessary information so that treaty implementation can be monitored
closely. Concerns were expressed during the hearings that the brief, three-page
agreement did not contain adequate verification provisions. This report echoes
President Ronald Reagan's imperative to "trust but verify."
The committee also took steps to address the threat posed by Russia's
nonstrategic, or tactical, nuclear weapons. It is widely acknowledged that these
pose an unacceptably high risk of theft or diversion. The treaty now calls upon
the president to work closely with and provide assistance to Russia on the full
accounting, safety and security of the Russian tactical nuclear weapon
stockpile.
And, finally, the committee adopted a declaration encouraging the president
to continue efforts with Russia to reduce strategic offensive nuclear weapons to
as low a level as possible without jeopardizing national security interests. As
Biden said during the hearings, this agreement should not be "the end of
the ride." Let's hope he is right.
So, does the treaty and its resolution of ratification answer all concerns
about weapons of mass destruction falling into the hands of those who wish our
nation deadly harm? Certainly not - but, like the treaty itself, the committee's
actions are commendable.
Most importantly, the committee made sure that the president understood the
importance of maintaining strong levels of assistance for Nunn-Lugar threat
reduction programs. At a time when the United States is spending billions of
dollars to protect the homeland, it also makes sense to commit the appropriate
funds for programs addressing problems of unsecured weapons - nuclear, chemical
and biological.
The Senate must now act quickly to give its approval to the resolution - and
Congress and the administration must make sure that they back up their rhetoric
with real resources. Failure to do so jeopardizes all our lives.
BACK TO THE TOP #244 CONTENTS NEXT ARTICLE
|