
#10
Moscow Times
September 12, 2002
Is Putin Ready to Bargain?
By Pavel Felgenhauer
The United States and Britain are lobbying reluctant allies to sanction the
use of force to topple Saddam Hussein -- and President Vladimir Putin seems to
be first in line to be wooed. Last week, U.S. President George W. Bush and
British Prime Minister Tony Blair phoned Putin at his state residence in Sochi
on the Black Sea. The official Russian account of these conversations is that
Putin was "not convinced" force is the best option.
Many others in Moscow are more outspoken. The vast majority of State Duma
deputies are agreed that Moscow should not do anything to assist a U.S.-led
assault on Saddam. The official position of the Foreign Ministry is that UN
weapons inspectors should resume their work as soon as possible in Iraq and that
military action would only destabilize the Middle East and disrupt oil supplies.
However, accounts of recent Putin-Bush conversations from Washington differ
strongly from the Russian version. High-ranking U.S. diplomats say Bush and
Putin have discussed Iraq and Georgia and had a "very good
conversation."
The main bone of contention between Moscow and Washington seems at present to
be not so much Iraq as Georgia. The Kremlin has for some time been probing
Washington about a possible deal that would allow the Russians a free hand in
the Caucasus, including Georgia, while the Americans in turn corner Saddam. But
such a deal seems out of reach, since Washington has committed itself
unequivocally to supporting Georgian President Eduard Shevardnadze and "the
territorial integrity of Georgia."
The White House has recently officially confirmed the bombing of Georgian
territory by Russian planes on Aug. 23. In an apparent response, members of the
Federation Council have suddenly attacked a 12-year-old accord demarcating the
sea boundary near Alaska, signed by then-Soviet Foreign Minister Shevardnadze
and the U.S. secretary of state at the time, James Baker.
It is claimed that the accord has cost Russia's fishing industry more than
$1.4 billion over the years. Now the Prosecutor General's Office is examining
the possibility of indicting Shevardnadze for negligence or treason.
Mikhail Margelov, chairman of the Federation Council's foreign affairs
committee, told journalists that the Baker-Shevardnadze agreement was too
generous to Washington and called for it to be rewritten. Margelov -- a clever
and pragmatic politician -- is nowadays very close to the Kremlin. Without a nod
from Putin personally, Margelov would hardly have dredged up an outdated issue
that can only worsen U.S.-Russian relations without bringing Moscow any
dividends.
Putin is obviously deeply displeased with U.S. support of Shevardnadze, who
-- the Kremlin believes -- is harboring Chechen "terrorists" on
Georgian territory. In turn, Washington was dismayed by Russian officials openly
lying about the bombing of Georgia on Aug. 23.
John Evans, director of the Russian affairs office in the U.S. State
Department, told a Russian-German conference in Berlin on Monday: "On the
Kursk we knew instantly what happened, using our Cold War capabilities and
shared with Moscow immediately. We knew instantly that last year the Ukrainians
shot down a Russian plane with Israelis on board and again immediately told the
Ukrainians, the Russians and the Israelis."
On the bombing of Georgia on Aug. 23, the United States also knew the culprit
immediately, using its surveillance capabilities. But as with the Kursk, the
Russian military preferred to cover up the truth for as long as possible and
even further than possible.
Nevertheless, Washington is eager to strike a deal with Putin. Evans insisted
that U.S. policy on Chechnya has not changed: "Armed men running around the
Caucasus, crossing borders, killing people, are not our friends. In recent
months [Chechen rebel leader Aslan] Maskhadov has embraced jihad elements and
terrorists, so we are now reluctant to offer him to Moscow as a partner for
negotiations."
But will this be enough to coax Putin to go against most of his political
elite -- as after Sept. 11 -- and at least tacitly support a U.S. move against
Saddam? The Russian president is well known for often making unpredictable but
pragmatic decisions. Putin may figure that supporting Saddam is a hopeless
stance. The fact that the sea border problem near Alaska has abruptly faded from
national TV screens may be a sign that Putin is ready to bargain in earnest.
Pavel Felgenhauer is an independent defense analyst.
BACK TO THE TOP #222 CONTENTS NEXT ARTICLE
|