CDI Headlines Hot Spots Research Topics CDI Publications Television Search
CDI Mission CDI Staff CDI Expertise Paid CDI Internships Support CDI
CDI Home
CDI Russia Weekly Home

RW 2003 Master Index   Iraq: RW 2003             


 
Johnson's Russia List
 
 
CDI Russia Weekly Home Page
 
 
CDI Russia Weekly 2003
 
 
CDI Russia Weekly Archives
 
 
Search the CDI Russia Weekly
 
 
Links
 
 
 

CDI Russia Weekly #203 Contents   Plain Text - Entire Issue

#1
Jamestown Foundation
Russia's Week: 24 April 2002
24 April 2002--Volume VII, Issue 16

THE USUAL SUSPECTS....

President Vladimir Putin delivered his annual State-of-the-Nation address on April 18, and, despite the official secrecy that had surrounded the speech's contents prior to its delivery, rumors that his main theme would be the need to streamline the state apparatus turned out to be true.

Indeed, while listing the achievements of his governance over the past year--a modest reduction in unemployment, a modest growth in real wages and the passage of measures to reform the tax and judicial systems, to cut red tape for businesses and to permit the free sale of some land--the mood of the Russian president was well short of euphoric. He also faced reality and made note of it: Forty million Russians remain in poverty; the economy's slowing growth rate is likely to prevent Russia from catching up with the developed world. Having earlier castigated his cabinet for overly timid growth projections, Putin then declared that the main obstacle to rapid economic growth is Russia's "awkward, ineffective state apparatus." This, he said, remains "a black box" for most citizens and is mired in corruption. The problem, he continued, is not the state bureaucracy's size. He insisted, rather unconvincingly, that Russia's state apparatus is no bigger, and perhaps even smaller than those in other countries. The problem, he claimed, is that it is "badly organized" and staffed by people unacquainted with "system management." Calling for an "administrative reform" that would turn the state apparatus into a "compact working instrument of state policy," Putin ordered the cabinet to present restructuring plans forthwith.

If all of this had a familiar ring, it's because it had all been said before, in so many words. In his March 1997 address, then President Boris Yeltsin assailed top state officials for their "lack of will and indifference, irresponsibility and incompetence in dealing with state problems" and then reshuffled his cabinet. The Russian media speculated at the time that Yeltsin's next step would be to radically restructure the state apparatus. Izvestia even reported that Anatoly Chubais had been transferred from the post of presidential chief of staff to that of first deputy prime minister in order to change the government's "size and functions." A year later, in June 1998, Yeltsin that his administration had "begun to reduce drastically expenditure on the state apparatus." Two months later, the country's financial system collapsed.

DO AS I SAY, NOT AS I DO....

A cynic might deduce that when Russian leaders hit a dead end in their bid to reform the country, they start attacking officialdom. And while this is a minority view in the case of Putin, whose popularity rating remains steady at around 70 percent, it is still difficult to ignore.

One among this minority, Pyotr Aven, president of Alfa Bank and a former foreign trade minister, critiqued the status quo in unequivocal terms during last week's Russian Economic Forum in London. Providing one of the few sour notes in an otherwise upbeat event, Aven declared that no economic liberalization whatsoever was underway in Russia. "I am sure that the majority of those present in this room hold accounts in foreign banks, that many have real estate abroad, and that under Russian law all of us are criminals," he told the audience, which included the leading lights of Russia's political and business elite. Russian banks, Aven added, account for only 3 percent of the country's domestic investment. "What is the largest portion of Russian banks doing if they are not fulfilling their main function--crediting?" he asked. "They are involved in money laundering." He also lashed out at Russian government spending, saying that it amounts to 33 percent of the country's gross domestic product--"a huge burden on Russian business and a brake on economic growth." By way of invidious comparison, he noted that government spending in China accounts for only 13-17 percent of that country's GDP.

While Aven is himself a major beneficiary of oligarchic capitalism and no one would ever mistake him for Mother Theresa, he has frequently been refreshingly straightforward about post-Soviet Russia's economic realities. In 1994, for example, Aven declared that in Russia, millionaires were "appointed" by the state. In 1999, he wrote a devastating critique of Yeltsin-era economic reform, noting, among other things, that the country's largest enterprises had been "purchased with government money" and that the privatization of one aluminum factory alone had been "accompanied by twenty murders."

A NEW THREAT....

A rather more unexpected subject in Putin's annual address to the nation was, as he put it, "the rise of extremism." This, he said, was a "serious threat" to Russia's stability and security. It was expressed, he continued, "above all in slogans and fascist and nationalist symbols that lead to pogroms, people being beaten up and killed." While "bands of extremists" were acting essentially as organized crime groups and should be treated accordingly, he said that prosecutors and police did not have "sufficiently effective instruments" to bring the organizers of extremist crimes to justice.

The reason this section of the presidential address was something of a surprise was that Putin's accession to throne following the mercurial Yeltsin was supposed to mark the advent of relative political tranquillity and predictability. So, at least, went the conventional wisdom. Now, all of a sudden, Russia's head of state was confirming what newspapers were declaring in boldface headlines: The country was under threat from young white supremacists sporting swastikas and buzz cuts. Indeed, last week Muscovites and foreigners alike nervously awaited April 20, Adolf Hitler's birthday, with foreign embassies receiving emails from "Ivan," a self-proclaimed skinhead leader, warning that foreigners would be attacked, even killed, in memory of the Nazi dictator.

The skinhead movement in Russia, in fact, is not new. Indeed, as the newspaper Moskovskie Novosti noted last week, it was alive during the Soviet era and has been growing steadily ever since. In April of last year, about the time of that Hitler birthday anniversary, skinheads stabbed a Chechen man to death in central Moscow. Last October, two "non-Slavs" were murdered during a large-scale skinhead rampage on the Russian capital's outskirts.

EVEN PARANOIDS HAVE ENEMIES....

But is the growth of skinhead violence in Russia a more or less spontaneous manifestation of socioeconomic dislocation and ethnic tension, as in other countries? Or is it something more Byzantine?

--Communists

Russia's leading Communist says the latter. The day after Putin's national address, Gennady Zyuganov claimed that media reports on the skinhead threat were part of an organized campaign of "hysteria" designed to guarantee the passage of a restrictive Kremlin-backed law on extremism aimed, he alleged, at weakening "organized opposition forces"--meaning, of course, his own Communist Party of the Russia Federation (KPRF).

If Zyuganov's comments could be dismissed as the kind of conspiratorial ranting one would expect from the leader of the "national-patriotic" opposition--particularly since the KPRF was kicked out of its leadership posts in the State Duma earlier this month--the same could not be said about a pair of articles that appeared in two leading Russian publications. Echoing Zyuganov, the daily newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda said that one possible explanation for "the antiskinhead outcry" was the need "to scare public opinion" and thus ensure passage of the anti-extremism law. For its part, Profil, the weekly magazine published in conjunction with Business Week, noted the authorities could no longer rely on anticommunism to rally voters, as in 1996. With parliamentary elections set for 2003 and Putin up for re-election the following year, Profil wrote, the fight against extremism could provide the incumbent authorities with a compelling argument to the electorate voters on why they deserved four more years.

--Skinheads

Whatever the case, the feared skinhead pogroms did not take place on the Hitler birthday anniversary this year. But while some attributed this to the heightened police and Interior Ministry troop presence in Moscow and other Russian cities, other observers, including the newspaper Moskovsky Komsomlets, warned that the skinheads had merely postponed their Gotterdammerung plans. In addition, and more sensationally, that paper's reporter Svetlana Meteleva was able to hang out with one of the capital's skinhead groups for a week in mid-April. She described firsthand how its members received military-style training in the headquarters of the Moscow OMON special police unit, from OMON instructors.

If such official collusion with the skinheads has been authorized at high--or even the highest--levels, it is a dangerous game. "If this genie is let out of the bottle, it will not go back," Komsomolskaya Pravda wrote. "The seeds of nationalism may be spread by the skinhead gangs throughout the country, to create some horrifying offshoots. We do not know what Russian nationalism is, and God help us if we should find out."

-- Religion

Those seeds may already be sprouting. Cossacks in Rostov Oblast called for the expulsion from that region of foreigners and people without local residency registration, and demanded that the authorities deputize armed municipal Cossack detachments to battle illegal migrants. Meanwhile, Bishop Jerzy Mazur--a Polish citizen who is one of four Catholic bishops in Russia and whose diocese is in eastern Siberia--was refused entry into Russia on April 19. His visa was canceled, effectively banning him from Russia. Earlier this month, Russian immigration officers at Moscow's Sheremetevo Airport confiscated the visa of an Italian priest, who had been working in Russia for more than a decade, as he was catching a flight to Italy. In what is clearly part of the escalating battle between the Russian Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Church over the latter's activities in Russia, both men were told they were on a Russian special services' blacklist.

-- Foreigners

While there is no obvious link between the Russian president and any of the more blatant xenophobic tendencies increasingly manifest in Russian society, Putin showed that he was not insensitive to the new mood by publicly taking the side of those seeking to outlaw land sales to foreigners. "I understand the concerns of those who think that probably at the current stage we should not allow foreigners to legally buy land," he said. "I admit that for a time, until we understand what is going on, maybe we should not act hastily."

Compared with the skinheads' shenanigans, a ban on land sales to foreigners, and even the expulsion of foreign clerics and Draconian measures against illegal aliens, seem almost like reasonable measures. Precisely the point, the conspiracy theorists would say.

 

BACK TO THE TOP    #203 CONTENTS    NEXT SECTION


 
CENTER FOR DEFENSE INFORMATION
1779 Massachusetts Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20036-2109
Ph: (202) 332-0600 ยท Fax: (202) 462-4559
info@cdi.org