CDI Headlines Hot Spots Research Topics CDI Publications Television Search
CDI Mission CDI Staff CDI Expertise Paid CDI Internships Support CDI
CDI Home
CDI Russia Weekly Home

RW 2003 Master Index   Iraq: RW 2003             


 
Johnson's Russia List
 
 
CDI Russia Weekly Home Page
 
 
CDI Russia Weekly 2003
 
 
CDI Russia Weekly Archives
 
 
Search the CDI Russia Weekly
 
 
Links
 
 
 

CDI Russia Weekly #202 Contents   Plain Text - Entire Issue

#8
stratfor.com
April 15, 2002
CIA Will Continue Search for New Russian Technologies

Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB) said April 10 that it had blocked a CIA intelligence operation aimed at penetrating Russia's missile-design program, Russian media and the BBC reported. The FSB said CIA officers posing as embassy officials in Russia and another former Soviet state tried to recruit an employee at a secret Russian Defense Ministry installation, slipping him psychotropic drugs in attempts to get information from him. CIA and U.S. Embassy officials in Moscow refused to comment.

As STRATFOR has previously said, the end of the Cold War has done nothing to halt espionage activities. The current case suggests that even the budding friendship between Moscow and Washington cannot stop intelligence-gathering. There is still something in Russia that the United States considers to be worth spying on: new military technologies.

Despite Russia's financial and military declines in recent years, its scientific and technology potential remains formidable. The country remains a scientific power for two reasons: First, several experimental and research schools in the defense sector have survived in the post-Soviet era; and second, Russia has always had strong intellectual potential, which has been widely used for defense purposes. This remains in spite of the brain-drain created by better wages offered to scientists in the United States and other countries.

The current spy scandal involved a scientist working in a secret research center near Zhukovsky air base, the Russian air force's top test center, near Moscow. To STRATFOR's knowledge, this center is designing new air-to-air and air-to-surface missiles. The distinctive characteristics of these missiles include supersonic speed, low flight altitude, new elements of stealth technology and extremely accurate guidance systems. The United States currently lacks a reliable defense against these weapons, and its own versions of the missiles lack some advantages.

Despite the Russian military's diminishing production capabilities and financial resources, the country maintains design-technology superiority in other areas, such as new weapons systems for both surface ships and submarines. These include new ship-borne cruise missiles and a supersonic torpedo, Shkval, that is unsurpassed in speed and efficiency. U.S. citizen Edmund Pope was arrested and sent to prison last year in Russia while trying to obtain secrets concerning the Shkval from a contact at a Russia's Bauman Technical University, a leading defense technology center. It is worth noting that Pope was pardoned by President Vladimir Putin after spending only a few weeks in prison, ostensibly for health reasons: Putin said Pope was suffering from cancer, but American doctors who examined him later found no trace of the disease.

Russia also maintains the lead so far in designing anti-defense missiles. In fact, only Russian-made systems, such as the S-300 and its modifications, would be able to repulse a massive air onslaught by hundreds of cruise missiles and bombers, the kind of air offensive favored by the United States. The United States benefited greatly during its air campaigns in Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan because its enemies did not have such defense systems at their disposal -- Moscow refused to deliver them to Baghdad and Belgrade. Recently, Russian scientists created an even more powerful system, S-400, and are continuing to improve it.

Officials in Washington, who are embarking upon the National Missile Defense program, are concerned that Russia might develop a successful countermeasure, and Russian rocket scientists indeed are working on such technologies. Although these remain in the design stage -- and the Putin government has not yet made a decision on whether to proceed with production -- such technologies would help Russian strategic nuclear missiles overpower NMD systems and yet would cost a fraction of what Washington plans to spend on NMD.

All of these technologies and other scientific achievements in Russia will continue to be important objectives of U.S. intelligence activities. More spy scandals are likely, but Russia -- under the administration of Putin, who appears to be seriously committed to his pro-Western policy course -- will sweep them under the rug.

 

BACK TO THE TOP    #202 CONTENTS    NEXT SECTION


 
CENTER FOR DEFENSE INFORMATION
1779 Massachusetts Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20036-2109
Ph: (202) 332-0600 ยท Fax: (202) 462-4559
info@cdi.org