
#1
Russia: Roundtable Discusses Benefits, Drawbacks Of
U.S. Cooperation
By Francesca Mereu
A roundtable discussion this week in Moscow brought together Russian
lawmakers and political analysts to discuss how -- in the six months since
Russia joined the U.S.-led antiterrorism coalition -- Moscow has benefited from
the new partnership. Participants also questioned where President Vladimir
Putin's pro-Western policy will lead the country next.
Moscow, 4 April 2002 (RFE/RL) -- In the days following the 11 September
terrorist attacks on the United States Russian President Vladimir Putin
surprised many by joining the U.S.-led fight against terrorism, offering to
share intelligence and open air corridors for humanitarian flights to
Afghanistan.
Now, a month and a half before Putin and U.S. President George W. Bush meet
in Moscow for a Russia-U.S summit, Russian political analysts and lawmakers are
asking whether the seemingly warmer relations between the two countries have in
fact improved. They are also questioning where the Kremlin's pro-Western line is
leading the country. Both topics were discussed this week in Moscow at a
roundtable devoted to post-11 September Russian-U.S. cooperation.
Among the participants was General Leonid Ivashov, a former Defense Ministry
director of international military cooperation and now deputy director of the
Academy of Geopolitical Problems. Ivashov says both the Soviet Union before, and
Russia now, have always wished for a strategic partnership with the U.S. But
Ivashov says that what came after 11 September cannot be called a real
partnership between Russia and the U.S.
"In my opinion, there wasn't and there couldn't be any partnership. It
was just an emotional reaction to the September 11 tragedy. [At the time,] there
just was some irrational hope that [Russian-U.S.] relations would improve
radically. But in attempting to adjust Russian policy to U.S. policy, we just
wanted to solve a series of Russian problems. And maybe in some way, the Russian
political elite naively hoped to improve its personal image [abroad]."
Ivashov says the U.S. and Russia cannot be good partners because their
economic, military, and geopolitical interests differ too much. He says the two
countries look at the world, both in terms of its present and its future, in
entirely different ways. He describes Russia's view as more "multipolar,"
and willing to consider cooperation with countries like China and India to
balance U.S. influence.
Aleksandr Shabanov is the deputy chairman of the Duma's (lower house of
parliament) Foreign Affairs Committee. He says the U.S. has always followed its
own political course and won't change track to meet Russia's needs. He also says
Russia will never be able to achieve an equal footing with the U.S., which he
says has grown too powerful.
"[The U.S.] has such a dominant position in the world in every way. How
can you have equal relations with such a supreme power? Of course it's
impossible. We shouldn't have illusions and even think about it. Present-day
Russia and its elite have to accept it."
Aleksandr Livshits is a former finance minister and deputy premier. He
resigned after the 1998 financial crisis and the following year founded an
economic policy think-tank. Livshits says many hoped the new relations between
Russia and the United States in the wake of 11 September would bring economic
benefits.
But he says the U.S., which recently passed new steel tariffs aimed at
protecting its domestic industry, is trying to destroy the Russian steel market.
Moreover, he says, Washington has not yet lifted the Soviet-era Jackson-Vanick
trade barrier, which is a major obstacle to Russia's hopes of joining the World
Trade Organization. Livshits says Moscow and Washington have discussed the issue
for many years, but without results.
"[Russia's] status as a market [economy] is an issue that has been
discussed for some seven or eight years. I've witnessed, on several occasions,
our first president [Boris Yeltsin] looking at [former U.S. president Bill]
Clinton and saying, 'Bill, where's our status?' We were verbally promised that
the issue about our economic status would be considered, but instead, Kazakhstan
[got Jackson-Vanick lifted]. Now the U.S. and the European Union are preparing
plans whereby the status will be given to Russia but not extended to Russian
enterprises. Do you understand what that means? [It means] Russia without its
factories."
Vyacheslav Nikonov is a former political adviser to the foreign intelligence
wing of the Soviet-era KGB and currently runs the Politika Foundation
think-tank, which has close ties to the Kremlin. In contrast to many speakers at
the roundtable, he says good relations with the United States and the West may
work to Russia's advantage.
"If you have good relations with the U.S. and the West, you don't have
to waste all your energy defending yourself against the West; you don't have to
waste your energy fighting against international terrorism. It is prestigious to
have good relations [with the U.S. and the West], and, what's more, it gives you
the chance to be a member of some clubs [like the Paris Club of foreign
lenders]. Of course [the West] won't allow us to get into some [of its]
exclusive clubs, but we are allowed to take part in the G-8 meetings. [Good
relations with the West] give you the advantage of taking part in the
international economy. Moreover, you can count on investments, even if at the
same time you need to build up a good climate for investments in the country.
This is a domestic task, but also a foreign policy task."
Nikonov, however, criticizes Russian foreign policy. He says Russian policy
lacks a cohesive strategy for developing relations with the West. Moreover, he
says, Russia still does not understand what it wants from the United States and
the West in general.
"Our political elite, with their incessant ambitions, are continually
getting all huffy with the Americans even in matters that the Americans don't
have anything to do with. One example is the defeat of our team at the [Winter]
Olympic Games."
Aleksei Arbatov is a lawmaker from the liberal Yabloko faction and the deputy
chairman of the Duma Defense Committee. He says he does not approve of the way
the United States has behaved since 11 September, but he says Russian analysts
and lawmakers should put themselves in America's shoes before casting final
judgment.
"A good way to fight against such [anti-U.S.] emotions is to imagine how
we would have behaved if what happened in the U.S. had happened in Russia. I
believe that we would have behaved in a tougher way and that we would respect
less [than the U.S.] the interests of other countries."
In addition, Arbatov says, Russia -- while often criticizing U.S. and EU
policy -- has never offered a tangible alternative.
"We are rightly against NATO enlargement, but what can we offer in
exchange to the Europeans for their security? Absolutely nothing. The same
situation concerns the Balkans. Did we at the time offer some real alternatives
to that terrible crisis that disturbed us so much? No, we didn't offer anything.
Where we don't offer a convincing alternative, there will be an alternative
[offered] that is not ours."
Arbatov believes that it would be against Russia's interests to create bad
relations with the United States. But he says Russia should steer clear of what
he calls the "America-centric" nature of Russia's domestic and foreign
policy since 11 September. He says, instead, "Russia has to orient its
relations toward those countries that have good relationships with the U.S. but
are sometimes critical of U.S. policy" -- like South Korea, Japan, India,
and EU countries.
But Arbatov says Russia must think carefully about its own policy. "We'd
like to be at the same level as the U.S. and the West, but inside our country we
are not behaving according to Western standards," he says, citing the lack
of press freedom and human-rights violations in Russia's war in the breakaway
republic of Chechnya.
BACK TO THE TOP #200 CONTENTS NEXT SECTION
|