
#6
Russia: Forum Aims To Foster Conditions For Civic
Society
By Francesca Mereu
Thousands of members of Russia's civic and human rights organizations
gathered in Moscow yesterday for the opening of a two-day Kremlin-sponsored
Civic Forum. President Vladimir Putin said the government is ready to work with
the public to create a better civic life in Russia. But many activists aren't
convinced the government's attitude toward human rights and the creation of a
truly civic society will ever really change.
Moscow, 22 November 2001 (RFE/RL) -- About 5,000 representatives of citizens'
groups and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) gathered yesterday at the
Kremlin State Palace to begin a two-day Civic Forum.
The Forum, organized by the Kremlin and other branches of the Russian
government, is intended to create favorable conditions for the development of an
independent and stable civic society in Russia. A civic society is one in which
NGOs and numerous other institutions form a buffer between the people and a
government, one which limits the power of the government and empowers ordinary
citizens.
In a speech opening the forum, Russian President Vladimir Putin told
delegates his government is ready to work with the public to improve civic life
in the country. Putin said that in order to have both a stable state and a
prosperous society, it is necessary for the state and society to start a
dialogue: "It is impossible to have a strong state, a flourishing and
prosperous society, if there isn't good relations of partnership between the
state and civic society. [To achieve it,] it is necessary to start a dialogue on
equal terms. We understand that the effectiveness of such a dialogue to a large
extent depends on us, on the representatives of the authorities and on the
authorities as a whole. As far as this is concerned, we are ready to carry out
the essential organizational measures and, if needed, legislative
measures."
Putin acknowledged that civic society in Russia is still not "fully
mature." He said the goal of the authorities is to create favorable
conditions for the development of a civic society: "The state has only one
task here. It must create the most favorable environment to develop a civic
society. It is the main task, and essentially the only one [that the state
has]."
Putin promised that the state will not try to take control of civic society
and underlined that, in the end, a civic society cannot be created by
instruction of the authorities: "Everyone understands that a civic society
cannot be formed at the initiative of government officials. I think it is
absolutely unproductive, practically impossible and even dangerous to try to
create a civic society from the top down."
Ella Panfilova, the leader of the Movement for Civilian Dignity and a deputy
in the State Duma, or lower house, is one of the organizers of the Civic Forum.
She tells RFE/RL that it is important for Putin to work with the numerous NGOs
spread across Russia. She says Putin has instituted a variety of reforms in
Russia, including an effort to introduce a more Western European approach in the
judiciary, as well as dramatic tax reforms.
Putin, Panfilova adds, needs the support of Russian citizens to keep the
reforms moving forward: "[Putin] understands that to accomplish the big
reforms [he has begun], he cannot count only on bureaucrats and government
officials. [The Russian president] and [the] authorities carry the reforms in
people's interests, and people have to be involved in the reform process."
Aleksandr Vyeshnyakov is the chairman of Russia's Central Election
Commission. He tells RFE/RL that sometimes "those in power" do not
understand the needs of society and that, as a result, the authorities are often
seen as being "at the opposition." Now, he points out, the situation
has changed, and the Civic Forum is an expression of the Russian government's
will to start a dialogue with Russian society: "In my point of view, [this
forum] is an attempt to start a normal and constructive dialogue between those
in power and the society. In my point of view, [Russian] society has to support
this [initiative]. And as a representative of those in power, I can say that I'm
[ready] to start such a dialogue with pleasure."
According to Lyudmila Alekseyeva, chairwoman of the Moscow Helsinki Group,
there are about 70,000 public organizations in Russia with a total membership of
about 1 million people. These organizations provide services to about 20 million
people.
Many of these organizations, however, are refusing to take part in the Civic
Forum. Some of them believe Russian authorities are unlikely ever to truly
change their attitudes toward human rights. Others criticize the Forum as simply
a public relations exercise organized by the Kremlin to prove to the West that
Russia is not only participating in the fight against terrorism, but that it is
going ahead with democratic reforms.
Critics of the Civic Forum quote Gleb Pavlovsky, the Kremlin's media adviser
and director of the Effective Policy Foundation, as saying recently that the
millions of people involved with Russian NGOs represent about 10 percent of
voters and that, for this reason, the authorities cannot afford to overlook
them.
Yevgeny Klyod of St. Petersburg heads Nadezhda (Hope), an organization that
helps orphans. He said he decided to take part in the Civic Forum in the hope
that things will change in Russia. In particular, Klyod says he hopes the
government's attitude toward organizations such as his will change. He says
people who are ready to help Nadezhda often change their minds when they
discover how much red tape they must endure: "I think things will change.
[The authorities] have to change the existing mechanism used to solve the
present problems. We have good laws, but the application of it is imperfect
[since] bureaucracy slows everything down."
Roman Chyorny is the representative of the Civic Commission for Human Rights
of St. Petersburg, an organization that helps the mentally challenged. Chyorny
-- alluding to opening speeches made by government officials -- says the Forum
was well-organized by the Kremlin's image-makers. He says the authorities who
spoke said exactly what the people wanted to hear: "It is evident that
[those who spoke today] used the results of some polls. I'll use the term
'push-button.' I mean, they were able to push the right buttons. They knew what
could make people react, and they spoke about it. They spoke about problems, but
they were not able to suggest any solutions to it. [Authorities] didn't even
indicate that it could be possible to find a solution to [our] problems and how
to do it."
Mikhail Smorchevsky is the president of a Moscow association that helps the
children of servicemen who died while on duty. He said he is disappointed with
the Forum. He says the authorities are using it as an arena to express their
points of view and that there isn't any chance for real dialogue with civic
organizations: "A forum is when representatives of society and [the]
authorities speak together. But here they just spoke for formality's sake and
left. They left the Forum to [speak] to itself. We gathered here to speak with
the president, [to] ask him questions."
In order to avoid being used by the Kremlin, the NGOs adopted a set of rules,
including guidelines for transparent financing and agreement about the
non-election of any presidium or governing bodies. Participants also agreed not
to issue any declarations.
In special sessions yesterday, Forum participants discussed some of Russia's
most pressing problems, including measures to combat corruption, social
protection of military service people, the reform of Russia's military,
educational system and youth and migration policies, the rights of refugees and
migrants, and how to achieve peace in Chechnya.
BACK TO THE TOP #181 CONTENTS NEXT SECTION
|