| CDI HOME | ISLP HOME | SEARCH | FURTHER INFORMATION | UPDATES |
Law Project Home = Click here for TOPICS =
Related Links
::
Law Project Home
::
Treatment of Iraqi Detainees by Iraqi Security Forces During U.S. Occupation
:: Iraq Prisoner Abuse and the Geneva Conventions
:: U.S. National  Responsibility for Violations of the Geneva Conventions at Abu Ghraib Prison
:: Abu Ghraib Court Martial: "Ring Leader" Spc. Charles A. Graner, Jr., Sentenced to Ten Years
:: Abu Ghraib Court Martial: Military Intelligence Spc. Armin J. Cruz
:: Abu Ghraib Court Martial: Specialist Megan Ambuhl, USA
:: Abu Ghraib Court Martial: Staff Sgt. Ivan Frederick, USA
:: First Abu Ghraib Prisoner Abuse Court Martial: Jeremy Sivits

Law Watch - Detainees
Abu Ghraib Court Martial: Specialist Megan Ambuhl, USA

Steven C. Welsh, Esq., swelsh@cdi.org, www.cdi.org/news/welsh/

Army Specialist Megan Ambuhl has become the third military police reservist and fourth U.S. soldier convicted over Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse.  For standing by while abuse occurred and failing to intervene or report it, Ambuhl was convicted on Oct. 30, 2004, of dereliction of duty and sentenced to reduction in rank to private and loss of a half-month’s pay.

Additional charges brought against Ambuhl but dropped under the pretrial agreement had included allegations of conspiracy, maltreatment, and indecent acts.  In addition to having the charges reduced, Ambuhl was subjected to a summary court martial under which any imprisonment that might have been imposed would have been limited to thirty days. 

Ordinarily the summary court martial, limited to enlisted personnel, is reserved for minor disciplinary offences, in contrast to the potentially more punitive special court martial and general court martial.  At a background briefing in May 2004 prior to the first Abu Ghraib court martial, a senior military lawyer explained:

The summary court martial.  Maximum punishment is 30 days.  Officers don’t go to summary court martials, because, one, they can’t be confined in a summary court martial.  It’s generally considered for minor disciplinary-type procedures, minor military-type offenses; UA, unauthorized absence, for example, smart-mouth at your commander, et cetera.

Senior Military Lawyer, “Background Briefing – Uniform Code of Military Justice and Court Martial Procedures,” DoD News Transcript, May 19, 2004, http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2004/tr20040519-0785.html

Ambuhl reportedly was present during sexually humiliating abuse including the formation and photographing of a human pyramid of nude detainees, and was partially visible in a photograph of Pfc. Lynndie England holding a leash attached to a nude detainee.  At the same time, several detainees reportedly praised Ambuhl for treating them humanely, and she apparently came to the aid of a detainee who had difficulty breathing after being punched by another soldier.

Dereliction of duty, the sole remaining charge against Ambuhl, is governed by Article 92  of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) governing the failure to follow orders or obey regulations:

892. ART. 92. FAILURE TO OBEY ORDER OR REGULATION
Any person subject to this chapter who--
(1) violates or fails to obey any lawful general order or regulation;
(2) having knowledge of any other lawful order issued by any member of the armed forces, which it is his duty to obey, fails to obey the order; or
(3) is derelict in the performance of his duties;
shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
10 USC §892, UCMJ Article 92, http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ucmj2.htm#892.%20ART.%
2092.%20FAILURE%20TO%20OBEY%20ORDER%20OR%20REGULATION
Because it was Ambuhl’s duty to intervene to stop the prisoner abuse, her failure to do so was akin to disobeying orders.

While admitting the wrongfulness of Ambuhl’s failure to intervene, Ambuhl’s attorney also has argued that she neglected to report the abuse because of the involvement of superiors and military intelligence personnel. 

Thus far, all four Abu Ghraib prosecutions have resulted in plea bargains and three have been brought under either a summary court martial or special court martial, with only former Army Staff Sergeant Ivan Frederick being subjected to a general court martial, resulting in an eight-year prison sentence.

Remaining Abu Ghraib courts martial include those of Pfc. England, scheduled to stand trial Jan. 17, 2005, Specialist Charles Graner, whose trial is set to begin Jan. 7, 2005, and Sgt. Javal Davis, who goes on trial starting Feb. 1, 2005.

Sources and further reading:

“Abu Ghraib Article 39A Hearings Held in Germany,” Armed Forces Press Service, Aug. 25, 2004, http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Aug2004/n08252004_2004082503.html

“Abu Ghraib guard agrees to plea bargain,” UPI, Nov. 2, 2004, http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20041102-074621-6323r.htm

Will Dunham, “Soldier Pleads Guilty in Abu Ghraib Scandal, Reuters,” Nov. 3, 2004, http://olympics.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=6695812

Estela I. Velez Pollack, “Military Courts Martial: An Overview,” Congressional Research Service Report, Order Code RS21850, May 26, 2004, http://www.fas.org/man/crs/RS21850.pdf

Senior Military Lawyer, “Background Briefing – Uniform Code of Military Justice and Court Martial Procedures,” DoD News Transcript, May 19, 2004, http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2004/tr20040519-0785.html

10 USC §892, UCMJ Article 92, http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ucmj2.htm#892.%20ART.%2092.%20FAILURE%20TO%20OBEY
%20ORDER%20OR%20REGULATION

Josh White, “Guilty plea by soldier spares her prison term,” The Washington Post, Nov. 3, 2004, http://www.boston.com/news/world/middleeast/articles/2004/11/03/soldier_pleads_guilty_to_failing
_in_duty_at_abu_ghraib/
.


[Disclaimer: Content available on this site is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. Use of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship.]
 
| TOP | CDI HOME | LAW PROJECT HOME | LAW TOPICS | SEARCH | CONTACT |