![]() |
Issues and Articles Archive |
|
U.S.-India Nuclear Cooperation Agreement: Is it Moving Toward Final Approval?
By George Bunn Dec 12, 2007 George Bunn, former General Counsel to the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, senior U.S. legal advisor during the drafting of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, and former LAWS Director, describes further developments and outlines additional obstacles in the implementation of the U.S.-India Nuclear Cooperation Agreement. With tensions raised again between Russia and the United States thanks to the proposed European missile shield, nuclear transparency becomes more important than ever. In this article, LAWS and WSI Legal Research Assistant Tom McNutt explains how the two sides can come together to renew the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START), and what happens if they don't. This article examines the implications of Article VI of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons' (NPT) and its call to undertake good faith negotiations towards disarmament. It introduces a republication of a 1994 writing by George Bunn and Roland Timerbaev, two chief legal advisors in the drafting of the NPT, who served the two largest nuclear weapons powers during those negotiations.
[Click on the headline above to read the introductory article, and click here to read a 19-page PDF of the 1994 article "Nuclear Disarmament: How Much Have the Five Nuclear Powers Promised in the Non-Proliferation Treaty?" (PDF). Referenced by the article, but absent from this PDF version, are appendices setting out the text of the NPT and its parties. Click here to read the NPT text provided by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (PDF) and click here to read a current list of NPT parties (broken up across multiple web pages) provided by the UN Office for Disarmament Affairs.] As LAWS President Philip A. Fleming explains, the following letter to Members of Congress and Senators signed by a number of nuclear nonproliferation experts, including two former LAWS Board members and a former LAWS chairman, criticizes the Administration's apparent departure from policies set by Congress in the Administration's negotiations with India concerning proposed US nuclear assistance to India despite India's acquisition and continuing development of nuclear weapons. Click on the headline above to read his commentary ... George Bunn, former General
Counsel to the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, senior
U.S. legal advisor during the drafting of the Nuclear
Nonproliferation Treaty, and former LAWS Director, examines the
latest status of the U.S.-India nuclear deal, and possible
obstacles ahead, and revisits some of the concerns lying at the
heart of the arrangement. Click on the headline above to read
his commentary ... Click on the above headline
to learn more ... Philip A. Fleming, LAWS
President, examines presidential signing statements,
historically and in light of current debate over their impact
and direction. Click on the headline above to read his full
commentary, including portions of a separate commentary by
"alumni" of the Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel
...
U.S.-India Nuclear Cooperation
Agreement: Can President Bush Refuse to Follow the Expressed
Will of Congress Concerning Nuclear Exports to India? George Bunn, former General
Counsel to the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, senior
U.S. legal advisor during the drafting of the Nuclear
Nonproliferation Treaty, and former LAWS Director, questions
President George W. Bush's use of signing statements to attempt
to qualify his acceptance of U.S.-India nuclear legislation,
possibly undertaking to skirt some its provisions. Click on
the headline above to read his commentary ... George Bunn, former General
Counsel to the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, senior
U.S. legal advisor during the drafting of the Nuclear
Nonproliferation Treaty, and former LAWS Director, examines U.S.
statutory changes permitting renewed U.S.- Indian nuclear
cooperation but imposing restrictions that include International
Atomic Energy Agency and multilateral Nuclear Suppliers Group
involvement. Click on the headline above to read his
commentary ...
Iranian Nuclear Program: UN
Security Council Resolution 1696 requires Iran, as a matter of
international law, to suspend uranium reprocessing and
enrichment and comply with IAEA requests for transparency Steven C. Welsh, Center for
Defense Information research analyst and legal scholar, examines
UN Security Council action on the Iranian nuclear program.
Click on the headline above to read his commentary ... Veteran senior arms control
attorneys George Bunn and John Rhinelander examine international
law and the role of the UN Security Council with respect to
withdrawal from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Click
on the headline above to read their commentary ... In their article in the
April/May 2005 issue of Disarmament Diplomacy, two
veteran arms control attorneys, George Bunn and LAWS board
member John Rhinelander, examine the UN Security Council's role
in addressing treaty withdrawals impacting international peace
and security. |