ADM home browse the video catalog television series info join our mailing list send us your feedback cool links to alternative media site map search our video catalog visit CDI's new security media center



  Show Transcript
Back from the Brink:
End the Nuclear Threat Now
Produced December 1, 1999

 
 

 

NARRATOR: In 1995, when most Americans thought the nuclear nightmare was over, we came close to a nuclear exchange with Russia. And it all happened entirely by accident.

The near catastrophe started innocently enough: Russia's early warning system mistook a US/Norwegian research rocket for a missile attack from one of America's nuclear submarines off the coast of Norway.

Russians, for reasons unknown, had never received Norway's notification of the launch. As the four-stage rocket began its ascent, it looked on Russian radar as if it were turning towards Russia.

As the upper stages of the rocket broke apart, the Russian radar operators concluded that the several blips were the multiple warheads of an incoming ballistic missile.

President Boris Yeltsin was informed that a nuclear missile was speeding towards the heart of Russia. Russian nuclear forces, already on a hair-trigger alert, were put on even higher alert, ready to launch at his command.

The fate of the planet hung in the balance as hundreds of millions of people were going about their daily lives.

Russian policy called for a "launch on warning." "Use them or loose them."

Yeltsin wisely waited. And within those fateful moments, the Russians were able to declare a false alarm. An unimaginable nuclear disaster had barely been avoided.

This illustrates the grave danger that confronts humanity today: launch of a nuclear missile by accident or miscalculation. According to experts, it is a danger that has increased since 1995 with the further deterioration of the Russian political situation.

Amy Lesser, On-line Director for the Center for Environmental Citizenship, works with young people in order to raise awareness of environmental issues.

LESSER: When I learned about the accident, or the almost accident in 1995, I was absolutely terrified. I had no idea that situations like this existed. It wasn't exactly surprising, since I'm fairly aware of the disintegration of the Russian infrastructure and government, etcetera, and I have been generally worried about whose hands our nuclear, the Russian nuclear weapons fall into. But I had no idea that it had actually escalated to the point where we almost had a nuclear disaster in this country.

NARRATOR: Admiral Stansfield Turner, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, describes the perilous circumstances that exist today.

TURNER: The danger is, first of all, mistakes, miscalculations, that they misinterpret something that's going on somewhere and they deliberately launch a nuclear weapon or several.

The second is they loose control of themselves, the whole system is breaking down. I mean, Russia is disintegrating. It's entirely possible that these weapons will now be under the control of the provincial governors, not the central government.

A third problem is accidents. When you have weapons of this magnitude that are deteriorating, they can deteriorate to the point where they launch accidentally.

NARRATOR: Because of the overall decline of Russian conventional military forces, Russia's war planners now rely more heavily on their nuclear arsenal to deter aggression. But that arsenal and especially its warning systems, are in a sorry state. Russia's feeling of military inferiority - heightened by the expansion of NATO and the war against Yugoslavia, Russia's ally - has caused them to set their nuclear deterrent on a very short fuse.

NARRATOR: Today, nuclear war between the U.S. and Russia is more likely to occur by accident or miscalculation than by a deliberate decision. The danger is not unique to Russia:

In November 1979, duty officers at four separate U.S. command centers reported seeing a full-scale missile attack against the United States.

TURNER: President Carter's national security advisor was awakened one night at 3 o'clock in the morning and told there were several thousand missiles coming at us across the Pacific Ocean. It turned out it was a total mistake.

NARRATOR: The false alarm was the result of a training tape being run as a demonstration for a United States senator and being mistaken for an actual missile attack.

NARRATOR: Dr. Bruce Blair, a former missile control officer in the Air Force, is now a leading authority on the dangers of accidental nuclear war.

BLAIR: Russia and the United States still operate their missile forces as though the Cold War never ended, and as though we may have to fire at them at any moment, en masse.

LESSER: I see no reason now that the Cold War is over that we should continue to have our nuclear weapons on alert status. There should be some benefit to ending the Cold War, and that benefit should be increased safety for everyone.

NARRATOR: Despite the dangerous decline of Russia's early warning system, the United States persists in a "first use" doctrine dating back to the attack on Hiroshima in World War II. Our stated willingness to use nuclear weapons "first" rather than exclusively for retaliation increases the danger of an accidental missile launch. In this time of heightened tensions between the two nuclear powers, traditional efforts to reduce nuclear arsenals on both sides are no longer sufficient to prevent an inadvertent nuclear launch.

BLAIR: The current path of nuclear arms control doesn't address the problem of a failure of control over nuclear weapons. It only addresses the size of the arsenal. So the idea is to extend the time is takes to launch nuclear forces, particularly missiles, from the current period of a few minutes, to a period of hours, days, weeks, months, eventually even years.

NARRATOR: De-alerting would immediately address the danger posed by Russia's increasingly unstable nuclear weapons complex, as well as the United States "launch on warning" strategy.

Making sure that neither the U.S. nor Russia would try to gain military advantage by cheating on a de-alerting program is an important issue that Dr. Blair believes can be easily worked out.

BLAIR: Some of the verification means are very simple: looking down from space by satellite, counting the number of submarines in port. Others are more technically sophisticated.

NARRATOR: Dr. Arjun Makhijani, president of the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, is an expert on arms control and related technical issues. He believes de-alerting is a workable solution to the danger of an accidental launch.

MAKHIJANI: The only thing today that can physically devastate the United Stated is the Russian nuclear arsenal. It is very huge, and it can destroy this country. At the same time, the Russians aren't going to take the leadership, because they don't have conventional military capability.

NARRATOR: For Russia to de-alert its weapons, the United States - because of its overwhelming military superiority - should lead by example.

MAKHIJANI: In order to protect itself and be secure, the United States must take the leadership and de-alert its nuclear weapons, in order to convince the Russians it's serious, that it won't destroy Russia with nuclear weapons, and that Russia must de-alert its nuclear weapons. It's the only way to safety.

NARRATOR: General Vladimir Dvorkin, a top advisor to the Russian Defense Minister, outlines a three-step approach to take all nuclear weapons off alert during a videotaped discussion with Bruce Blair.

DVORKIN:(Through a translator) To begin with, there should be a treaty between the presidents of Russia and the United States. We should start multilateral discussions about reducing the level of readiness of nuclear weapons from all countries, after which, use technical measures to bring down readiness levels, which would be based on strict controls and would be entirely transparent.

NARRATOR: A unilateral move by the United States to de-alert nuclear weapons has a precedent. In 1991, when the Soviet Union was starting to fall apart and the threat of a black market in nuclear arms emerged, President Bush withdrew [virtually] all the U.S. tactical nuclear weapons from deployment and de-alerted many of our large strategic missiles. About a week later President Gorbachev directed the Soviet Union to do the same.

MAKHIJANI: Very, very grave nuclear dangers were avoided. I don't think anybody made any mistake that President Bush was soft on defense, or that he was lowering the guard of the United States. He did the most important gesture for assuring U.S. security, by acting to prevent miscalculations, black markets in nuclear weapons, and so on. Today, it's very, very important that President Clinton do the same thing, by acting to de-alert U.S. nuclear weapons, to give President Yeltsin the political room to de-alert his.

NARRATOR: The world was made somewhat safer when the United States and Russia de-targeted a majority of their nuclear weapons. But weapons can be quickly re-targeted. Most important, de-alerting would eliminate the threat of a surprise attack from either side, while the capability for a devastating retaliation would not be lost.

MAKHIJANI: People in Russia and the United States recognize that we have to move from mutually assured destruction to mutually assured survival. The adversarial relationship is over, and we have to find a way in which nuclear weapons are not going to result in complete devastation by accident.

BLAIR: If the bomb's not on the missiles, if it takes a day to put the bomb back on the missiles, there can't be any unauthorized launch by demoralized, disaffected nuclear units out in Siberia who are finally fed up.

TURNER: We're not in danger, in my opinion, of a massive attack like we had to worry about during the Cold War. But if they go to Yeltsin and say, "Our warning system tells us that they're coming at us," and it's really not true because the warning system has broken down and is giving them false indicators, he may well launch something. And if it's one nuclear detonation on our soil, that's a catastrophe.

NARRATOR: As the dominant nuclear power in the world, the United State can afford to start the de-alerting process on its own. However, unless pressed by strong public opinion, Congress will tend to maintain the status quo.

LESSER: So now that the nuclear test ban treaty has been defeated, I think that not only is this one way to let our Congressmen know that we're disappointed with that defeat, but also this is the most viable method now, to ensure nuclear safety for the future. It only takes a presidential initiative to make this happen. So should the will of the people be made known to the President and to Congress, then I really think that we could accomplish this in the next year.

NARRATOR: It is up to the individual citizens to make their views known by contacting their members of Congress, alerting their local media and supporting national organizations that are working to ease the hair-trigger that remains placed on the world's nuclear weapons.

LESSER: Young people have every reason to become involved in this issue. It's almost self-evident. It's our lives. If we don't take nuclear weapons off of alert status it's very likely that with the Russian government deteriorating, that we could have a nuclear accident within the next decade. We would like to live our lives, we have children to raise someday… we work for different causes on campus and in our communities and it's all worthless if we blow up next week.

Rep. LYNN WOOLSEY: Members of Congress who are in the middle, the swing members who will step up to this if they get pressure from their constituents. They need to know it's important to their constituents. They need to know why. They need to hear from their constituents in a very informed way how dangerous this world is. NARRATOR: To add your voice to this campaign, to obtain a copy of this video, or sample materials to send to your local newspaper, member of Congress or the President,call the Back from the Brink Campaign at our toll-free number, 1-877-55BESAFE.

You can also find us on the Internet at www.dealert.org

NOTE: On November 11, 1999 the European Parliament called for all nuclear weapons to be taken off hair-trigger alert by the new year.


   


Produced by the Center for Defense Information
Narrator: Senator Dale Bumpers (Ret.)
Scriptwriter: Ben de la Cruz
Segment Producer: Rachel Freedman
Show Number: 1353

 

Center for Defense Information        1779 Massachusetts Ave         Washington DC 20036        800-CDI-3334